The Corner


From a reader:

Dear Mr. Goldberg,

In your Dec. 30 column you mentioned the BBC’s directive not to call Saddam Hussein a “dictator.” An amusing contrast is their readiness to use that term with others such as Augusto Pinochet. Here are a few examples that Google turned up:

The last link is a brief history of Chile which has a “Pinochet dictatorship” section. I was curious whether they used “dictator” in other country profiles. Not for Iraq. In Cuba’s they do, but not for Castro, only for one of his predecessors.

I think it’s perfectly accurate to call both Hussein and Pinochet dictators. However, if one was requiring strict criteria for using this subjective characterization, Pinochet would much less qualify as a dictator than Hussein, e.g., level of dissent allowed, domestic body count, and the degree which others in his junta limited his one-man rule.

Jonah Goldberg — Jonah Goldberg holds the Asness Chair in Applied Liberty at the American Enterprise Institute and is a senior editor of National Review. His new book, The Suicide of The West, is on sale now. @jonahnro

Most Popular

PC Culture

When PC Comes Back to Bite You

Political correctness run amok is a popular topic on the right these days. Indeed, the conservative bookshelf is chock full of best-sellers devoted to the topic. Subject matters vary. One may focus on the hypocrisy of campus speech codes, another on the revisionist attempt to indict our founding fathers, yet ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Charles Krauthammer, R.I.P.

It’s not often that the loss of an opinion writer can be said to be a loss for the country, but that is true of Charles Krauthammer, the Pulitzer Prize–winning columnist who died yesterday. In a fractured media environment where almost no one commands universal respect, where crudity of expression and ... Read More