The Corner

The ‘DISCLOSE Act, Stripped Down’ Fable

The New York Times, apparently unaware that the lame-duck session already is chock full of important work, offers their readers a thumb-sucking editorial bemoaning “secret money” and agitating for the DISCLOSE Act.

Don’t be fooled by promises from the Hill that a “stripped-down” version solves the constitutional issues that were evident in the original bill. The DISCLOSE Act — even a “disclosure only” DISCLOSE (wasn’t that what it was before: “just disclosure”?) — would still infringe on private association rights. It would, for instance, still require groups to reveal their donors regardless of whether the donations were intended for independent expenditures or electioneering communications. It would also impose draconian disclosure burdens on donations made from one organization to another, including those not made with the intent of supporting independent expenditures. And that’s just for starters.

— Allison Hayward is the vice president of policy at the Center for Competitive Politics.

Allison R. Hayward — Nina Owcharenko is a senior policy analyst for health care at the Heritage Foundation's Center for Health Policy Studies.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

‘We Can’t Afford It’

Leon Trotsky — n.b., Millennials: He was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez before she was — understood the power of single-payer systems: “The old principle: who does not work shall not eat, has been replaced with a new one: who does not obey shall not eat.” The socialist powers of Trotsky’s time made good on ... Read More

When the Press Sees Red

You’ve probably seen the viral footage of a Native American beating his drum, surrounded by a crowd of students from Covington Catholic high school. One of them, wearing a MAGA hat, is right in front of him, with a smirk on his face. It was an odd moment combining the end of the March for Life, which the ... Read More