The Corner

The ‘DISCLOSE Act, Stripped Down’ Fable

The New York Times, apparently unaware that the lame-duck session already is chock full of important work, offers their readers a thumb-sucking editorial bemoaning “secret money” and agitating for the DISCLOSE Act.

Don’t be fooled by promises from the Hill that a “stripped-down” version solves the constitutional issues that were evident in the original bill. The DISCLOSE Act — even a “disclosure only” DISCLOSE (wasn’t that what it was before: “just disclosure”?) — would still infringe on private association rights. It would, for instance, still require groups to reveal their donors regardless of whether the donations were intended for independent expenditures or electioneering communications. It would also impose draconian disclosure burdens on donations made from one organization to another, including those not made with the intent of supporting independent expenditures. And that’s just for starters.

— Allison Hayward is the vice president of policy at the Center for Competitive Politics.

Allison R. Hayward — Nina Owcharenko is a senior policy analyst for health care at the Heritage Foundation's Center for Health Policy Studies.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

The Beatification of Beto

The media’s treatment of Texas Democratic candidate Beto O’Rourke wasn’t the most egregiously unfair coverage of the past year -- that would be the treatment of Brett Kavanaugh -- but it ranks among 2018’s most annoying. The endless glowing profiles of O’Rourke in every publication from Vanity Fair to ... Read More

The Odds Are Slim to Nunes

When the history of the 2018 midterms is written, there will be a chapter on missed opportunities for Democrats. Some may wonder if they should have spent so much money supporting Beto O’Rourke in Texas, or whether Heidi Heitkamp was doomed from the start in North Dakota. One painful question for progressives ... Read More