The Corner

The DISCLOSE Disaster

Eight former FEC commissioners, including me, have sent a letter to Congress criticizing the DISCLOSE Act, which was introduced by Senator Schumer and Representative Van Hollen at the end of April. The bill is specifically designed to try to overturn the Supreme Court’s First Amendment decision in Citizens United v. FEC

DISCLOSE stands for “Democracy Is Strengthened by Casting Light On Spending in Elections,” but, as former FEC Chairman Brad Smith says, DISCLOSE should stand for “Democratic Incumbents Seeking to Contain Losses by Outlawing Speech in Elections.”

This bill is a morass of confusing, duplicative, unnecessary, and onerous provisions that are clearly designed to deter political speech and political advocacy, particularly criticism of incumbents like Schumer and Van Hollen.  Despite claims to the contrary, it also abandons the longstanding policy of treating unions and businesses equally, which highlights the partisan motives underlying the bill.  A press release about the letter is available here, as is copy of the detailed letter, which outlines all of the problems with the New Sedition Act — the title that I think would be more appropriate than “DISCLOSE.” 

Most Popular


A Home Run by Trump

In 2007, the Justice Department was in disarray. Though it was largely exaggerated, a controversy over the firing of some United States attorneys, the intrusion of politics into Justice Department hiring decisions, and White House contacts with Main Justice forced the resignation of an overmatched attorney ... Read More
Energy & Environment

Identifying the Problem

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (including all passengers on Spaceship Earth), So, as often happens, a weasel crawls up your tailpipe (I mean of your car, sicko). It ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Donald Trump and the Imperial Presidency

As the writer of a weekly political column in the Age of Trump (ugh), I have lately been wondering if, bereft of an idea, I might just write TRUMP over and over again, 750 times, and get people to read it. An idle thought — perhaps. After all, this was the week when my Twitter timeline was full of mainstream ... Read More