The Corner

Politics & Policy

‘Disparate Impact’ Again — This Time in Housing

Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., March 22, 2018. (Kevin Lamarque/REUTERS)

Once again the Left is insisting that, if you don’t favor using the “disparate impact” approach in civil-rights enforcement to the nth degree, then you are a racist, and the MSM can be counted on to accept this narrative uncritically. We recently went through all of this with respect to school discipline, and now a front-page story in the Washington Post does the same thing with respect to housing.

A housing policy that actually treats people differently with regard to skin color — “disparate treatment” — is wrong and illegal and should be challenged, and there is no evidence that Ben Carson and the Trump administration’s Department of Housing and Urban Development disagree. The problem is when a policy is nondiscriminatory on its face, in its intent, and in its application — but also leads to politically incorrect racial numbers, or “disparate impact.” So, for example, a landlord prefers not to rent to people with a history of violent crime or not paying bills, and follows that policy without regard to race, but as a result refuses a higher percentage of, say, African American applicants than, say, Asian American applicants.

To call this policy discriminatory, let alone racist, is quite a stretch not only as a matter of language but also as a matter of law and policy. And note that, to the extent that such policies are challenged, those hurt most will include other tenants in high-crime areas, who are themselves likely to include a disproportionate number of African Americans.

So here’s hoping that the Trump administration will stick to its principles, and be aggressive in challenging actual racial discrimination in housing, but very cautious in its use of the disparate-impact approach. (Some recognition of it, alas, may be inevitable given a poor 2015 Supreme Court decision in this area; that’s not the case, thankfully, with respect to school discipline.)

Most Popular

Elections

Stick a Fork in O’Rourke

If, as I wrote last week here, Joe Biden may save the Democratic party from a horrible debacle at the polls next year, Beto O’Rourke may be doing the whole process a good turn now. Biden, despite his efforts to masquerade as the vanguard of what is now called progressivism, is politically sane and, if ... Read More
Elections

In Defense of the Electoral College

Senator Elizabeth Warren has joined a growing chorus within the Democratic party in calling for the abolition of the Electoral College. Speaking at a forum in Mississippi on Monday night, Warren said that she hoped to ensure that “every vote matters” and proposed that “the way we can make that happen is ... Read More
Education

Ivy-League Schools Wither

A  number of liberal bastions are daily being hammered — especially the elite university and Silicon Valley. A Yale and a Stanford, or Facebook and Google, assume — for the most part rightly — that each is so loudly progressive that the public, federal and state regulators, and politicians would of ... Read More
National Security & Defense

In Defense of the Iraq War

Today is the 16th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, and Twitter is alive with condemnations of the conflict -- countered by precious few defenses. Yet I believed the Iraq War was just and proper in 2003, and I still believe that today. When Donald Trump condemned the war during the 2015 primary campaign and ... Read More