The Corner

Politics & Policy

Dying for Diversity

In response to

Just to piggyback on what Mark has already said about the immigrant “diversity lottery” — which bike-path terrorist Sayfullo Saipov reportedly used to gain entry into the U.S. — the irrationality of the program is striking. As I noted in an NR magazine essay way back in 2011, our immigration system is built on three main goals that most Americans endorse to one degree or another: reuniting families, adding specialized skills, and helping people displaced by war or persecution. There is much disagreement over how to balance those goals, but randomly distributing green cards to certain countries, as the diversity lottery does, accomplishes none of them. It does not bring families together, make our workforce more skilled, or further any humanitarian ends.

Defending the lottery in 2006, Senator Chuck Schumer stated that “it had a very simple purpose . . . our immigration laws were based on family reunification and certain other qualifications [useful skills], so there were whole ranges of countries from which people could not get visas.” There you have it. The only purpose of the program is right there in the name — “diversity,” which is as empty a purpose as one can imagine. “The U.S. isn’t Noah’s Ark,” Powerline’s Paul Mirengoff noted yesterday. “We don’t need immigrants from every country.” Especially not immigrants selected at random.

One terrorist incident by itself does not justify abolishing a program, but it does bring the pointlessness of the lottery into sharp relief. When a refugee commits terrorism, there is perhaps some minor consolation that our heart was in the right place when we brought him here. For all the problems with our refugee program — and there are many — at least it is rooted in our desire to alleviate human suffering around the globe. But Sayfullo Saipov was not invited for any humanitarian reason, nor was he invited to rejoin family members or to apply his specialized skills. He was invited because his name was drawn out of a diversity hat. Cold comfort to his victims, indeed.

Jason Richwine is a public-policy analyst and a contributor to National Review Online.

Most Popular

Film & TV

A Sad Finale

Spoilers Ahead. Look, I share David’s love of Game of Thrones. But I thought the finale was largely a bust, for failings David mostly acknowledges in passing (but does not allow to dampen his ardor). The problems with the finale were largely the problems of this entire season. Characters that had been ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Great Misdirection

The House Democrats are frustrated, very frustrated. They’ve gotten themselves entangled in procedural disputes with the Trump administration that no one particularly cares about and that might be litigated for a very long time. A Washington Post report over the weekend spelled out how stymied Democrats ... Read More

Australia’s Voters Reject Leftist Ideas

Hell hath no fury greater than left-wingers who lose an election in a surprise upset. Think Brexit in 2016. Think Trump’s victory the same year. Now add Australia. Conservative prime minister Scott Morrison shocked pollsters and pundits alike with his victory on Saturday, and the reaction has been brutal ... Read More
NR Webathon

We’ve Had Bill Barr’s Back

One of the more dismaying features of the national political debate lately is how casually and cynically Attorney General Bill Barr has been smeared. He is routinely compared to Roy Cohn on a cable-TV program that prides itself on assembling the most thoughtful and plugged-in political analysts and ... Read More