The Corner

Do They Really Believe This Nonsense?

Many years ago — early in my litigation career against campus censorship and repression — I challenged in court a policy that confidently declared, “Acts of intolerance will not be tolerated.”

Think about that sentence for a moment — would the university violate its own policy against intolerance by not tolerating intolerance, and then be forced to punish itself? At any rate, a federal judge struck it down, and that particular phrase of repressive college doublespeak started to disappear into the memory hole.

The impulse to cloak censorship and repression in high-minded nonsense remains, however. Yesterday the New York Times covered the plight of Christian groups on campus, where groups at dozens of universities — including in the California State University System, the nation’s largest — face exclusion from campus because they refuse to submit to demands that they not use their religious faith when determining the leaders of religious groups. As if it should be irrelevant whether a Christian bible study leader is actually Christian. Justified as a diversity initiative, it is motivated by nothing but malice — the desire to force Christian groups into a corner so that they either leave (the preferred outcome), water down their faith to accommodate university-approved ideologies (a decent second-best alternative), or lie about their policies and actions (an immoral response that also leaves the groups vulnerable to school discipline).

But universities can’t tell the truth about this hostility, so they make utterly nonsensical statements like this, from Cal State’s lawyer, “Our mission is education, not exclusivity.”

What does this even mean? Cal State’s policy is fundamentally and intentionally exclusive, motivated by “education” only to the extent that it educates its students that there’s something wrong with faithful Christian students, that the exercise of their faith is harmful to the campus. In other words, exclusion is the point of Cal State’s “education.”

And students learn this lesson well. Do you wonder why so many of our citizens are convinced that you shouldn’t even hold a job unless you have the proper views on the sexual revolution? Look no further than your local campus, where intellectually bankrupt ideologues have spoken, loudly and clearly: Acts of intolerance will not be tolerated, and the “exclusive” shall be excluded.

Most Popular

Economy & Business

Who Owns FedEx?

You may have seen (or heard on a podcast) that Fred Smith so vehemently objects to the New York Times report contending that FedEx paid nothing in federal taxes that he's challenged New York Times publisher A. G. Sulzberger to a public debate and pointed out that "the New York Times paid zero federal income tax ... Read More
Immigration

The ‘Welfare Magnet’ for Immigrants

That term refers to a controversial concept -- and a salient one, given the Trump administration's efforts to make it harder for immigrants to use welfare in the U.S. A new study finds that there's something to it: Immigrants were more likely to come to Denmark when they could get more welfare there. From the ... Read More
Sports

The Kaepernick Saga Drags On . . . off the Field

Colin Kaepernick’s workout for NFL teams in Atlanta this weekend did not run smoothly. The league announced an invitation to scouts from every team to watch Kaepernick work out and demonstrate that he was still ready to play. (As noted last week, the workout is oddly timed; the NFL season is just a bit past its ... Read More
Elections

Elizabeth Warren’s Plan Nine from Outer Space

Time for another episode of Strange Thoughts with Elizabeth Warren. “Traffic violence kills thousands and injures even more Americans every year,” Senator Warren said on Twitter. “On World Day of Remembrance for Traffic Crash Victims, I’m sending my love to the families and friends of those who have lost ... Read More