The Corner

Politics & Policy

Trump Rules

(Michael Ciaglo/Pool/Getty)

Tonight, finally, the other candidates began to play by Trump rules. 

Rubio and Cruz interrupted, insulted, and mocked the Republican front-runner. Rubio obviously had the moment of the night, in the space of a couple of minutes exposing Trump’s utter vacuity on health-care policy, catching him repeating himself when Trump said he doesn’t repeat himself, and mocking Trump’s signature lines. Cruz was more prosecutorial and not as memorable but effective nonetheless. If I had any criticism, it was that they weren’t relentless enough and occasionally let up on the attack (this Peter Spiliakos post from a while ago nailed it). At one point, all three of the candidates were talking at once — this is what Trump has done, force everyone down to his level of reptilian politics where all that matters is trying to talk over people to establish your dominance.

It was very important that Rubio came out punching for his own image. If he had taken a pass on Trump tonight, he would have seemed incredibly weak and not a leader. Instead, he went toe to toe with him and won.

Much of the night, Rubio and Cruz worked together, seemingly in a belated recognition that if they can’t slow and diminish Trump, neither one of them has a chance to be the nominee.

As for Trump, he was bruised, but he had stabilized by the end of the debate in part through — what else? — interrupting and insulting. He got de facto assistance all night long from Wolf Blitzer, who would cut short exchanges among Rubio, Cruz, and Trump to go to Kasich and Carson. Trump had his moments — “the wall just got ten feet higher” — and, as always, delivered the message, quite effectively for his purposes, that he is not just another politician.

It is true that the core of Trump’s supporters will stay with him, but there is a lot of room between 24 percent (Iowa) and 46 percent (Nevada). There is such a thing as a marginal Trump supporter, and he or she is susceptible to persuasion. At the very least, tonight opened up avenues for further attack on and examination of Trump’s tax returns, his hiring of foreign workers, etc. If there were a coordinated anti-Trump effort, ads on some of these themes would follow in short order and surrogates would be out hammering away at them. But it’s a step in the right direction that other candidates are fighting by the only rules that will make it possible to take him down a notch — namely, the rules the mogul himself has used to establish his current dominance in the GOP race.


Rich Lowry — Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He can be reached via email: 

Most Popular

White House

The Problem Isn’t Just the GOP, Mr. Comey

During a CNN town hall on Wednesday night, James Comey alleged that the Republican party allows President Trump to get away with making inappropriate statements without holding him accountable. “If the Republicans, if they just close their eyes and imagine Barack Obama waking up in the morning saying someone ... Read More
Law & the Courts

‘Judges for the #Resistance’

At Politico, I wrote today about the judiciary’s activism against Trump on immigration: There is a lawlessness rampant in the land, but it isn’t emanating from the Trump administration. The source is the federal judges who are making a mockery of their profession by twisting the law to block the Trump ... Read More
White House

Trump’s Friendships Are America’s Asset

The stale, clichéd conceptions of Donald Trump held by both Left and Right — a man either utterly useless or only rigidly, transactionally tolerable — conceal the fact that the president does possess redeeming talents that are uniquely his, and deserve praise on their own merit. One is personal friendliness ... Read More

Columbia 1968: Another Untold Story

Fifty years ago this week, Columbia students riding the combined wave of the civil-rights and anti-war movements went on strike, occupied buildings across campus, and shut the university down. As you revisit that episode of the larger drama that was the annus horribilis 1968, bear in mind that the past isn’t ... Read More

Only the Strident Survive

‘I am not prone to anxiety,” historian Niall Ferguson wrote in the Times of London on April 22. “Last week, however, for the first time since I went through the emotional trauma of divorce, I experienced an uncontrollable panic attack.” The cause? “A few intemperate emails, inadvertently forwarded ... Read More