The Corner

The Latest Partisan Hit Job on Clarence Thomas

Alaska lawyer Moira Smith claimed a few weeks back that she had been groped by Justice Clarence Thomas at a dinner in 1999, a charge that got rapid traction in the left-wing and legal press due to liberals’ deep hatred of Justice Thomas, the leftover damage to his reputation from the 1991 Anita Hill hearings, and the subtext of a black man preying on a young white woman. Thomas, after issuing a vigorous denial (“The claim is preposterous and it never happened”), was left to lament once again the relentless campaign against him after a quarter century:

“I think we have decided that rather than confront disagreements, we’ll just simply annihilate the person who disagrees with me. I don’t think that’s going to work in a republic, in a civil society.  

The world of politics is full of charges of sexual misconduct of an almost endless variety, and we’ve learned from long experience that it is equally foolish either to automatically believe or disbelieve such charges (or to believe them only of your opponents); the proof is in the details. Smith’s claim seems curiously timed, as she only surfaced 17 years after the fact, and by her own testimony did so in direct response to the spate of stories about Donald Trump. The long delay alone isn’t proof by itself that her charges should be disbelieved, as there are often a variety of reasons women don’t come forward, but it’s a strike against her credibility, particularly given her choice of timing and the fact that she has obviously never since been in a position where the Justice had any power over her.

If that was all we knew, the charge might hang in the air ambiguously forever, but it’s not. I hope you’ve read Carrie Severino’s excellent summaries over at Bench Memos (here and here; more here and on the front page), and I’d add to that the followup piece in the National Law Journal, a summary from Must Read Alaska, and defenses from people otherwise critical of Justice Thomas, criminal defense lawyer Scott Greenfield and senior federal District Judge Richard Kopf. The short summary comes down to two main points:

One, Smith is a longstanding Democratic partisan, with extensive business, family and financial ties to the Democratic Party and various left-leaning organizations and causes, and thus intensely motivated to score points against Thomas as well as using him to add to the narrative pile-on against Trump. Her current husband, a former chairman of the Alaska Democratic Party, was forced out of a 2008 race for Congress after his campaign caught creating fake websites to discredit his opponent.

Two, the alleged groping took place in a public setting, in a roomful of witnesses, yet nobody else there supports Smith’s account: 

Louis Blair, the host of the 1999 dinner party and now retired as the Truman Foundation director, said he did not witness anything involving Thomas and Smith, and neither did another scholar who worked that evening with Smith….three of the other guests at the dinner—including [Blair]—said they had no knowledge of any “untoward activity” at the dinner. Blair noted that there were approximately 16 attendees “floating around” three rooms, and he is “skeptical that the justice and Moira would have been alone.”

As former Labor Secretary Raymond Donovan famously asked after a Bronx jury acquitted him of corruption charges in 1987, “Which office do I go to to get my reputation back?” Justice Thomas’ only recourse, it seems, will be to his legacy in the United States Reports.

Dan McLaughlin — Dan McLaughlin is an attorney practicing securities and commercial litigation in New York City, and a contributing columnist at National Review Online.

Most Popular


Trump’s Disgraceful Press Conference in Helsinki

On Monday, President Trump gave a deeply disgraceful press conference with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. The presser began with Trump announcing that although the Russia–U.S. relationship has “never been worse than it is now,” all of that “changed as of about four hours ago.” It was downhill from ... Read More

Questions for Al Franken

1)Al, as you were posting on social media a list of proposed questions for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, did it occur to you that your opinion on the matter is no more relevant than Harvey Weinstein’s? 2) Al, is it appropriate for a disgraced former U.S. senator to use the Twitter cognomen “U.S. ... Read More
National Security & Defense

Trump’s Helsinki Discord

Donald Trump is not, and never will be, the Moscow correspondent for The Nation magazine, and he shouldn’t sound like it. The left-wing publication is prone to extend sympathetic understanding to adversaries of the United States and find some reason, any reason, to blame ourselves for their external ... Read More