The Corner

Don’t Release Your Returns, Mr. Romney. Burn Them.

For what it’s worth, I disagree with the Editors’ conclusion that Mitt Romney should release additional tax returns.

1) Releasing more than he already has in response to the Obama campaign’s heckling is nothing less than letting his opponents dictate his campaign strategy, and it will embolden them to repeat the tack.

2) Romney is squaring off against one of the least transparent American administrations in modern history, headed by a president whose opaqueness has the added bonus of being massively hypocritical and counter to a prominent campaign promise. Romney ought to partner with some government-transparency non-profit and offer to release one year of returns in exchange for the release of each item on that organization’s most-wanted list.

3) The fact that some people think that Romney’s tax returns could reveal anything — short of evidence of law-breaking — useful about his capacity to serve as president is itself a scandal. He’s rich. But then, we knew that. He probably has some clever accountants. But then, we assumed that to begin with. What else do these people want except tabloid details about yachts and bank accounts? Remember, we live in a country where the IRS knows more about Romney than anybody but Ann. Romney should make this point explicitly. He should make the case that he represents a future in which your tax returns don’t define you as a person — both because it won’t be driven by class resentment, and because it will feature a reformed and simplified tax code, dramatically reducing the reams of personal minutiae the Leviathan requires to assess your contribution to the Common Defense and the General Welfare.

Daniel FosterDaniel Foster is a former news editor of National Review Online.

Most Popular

Media

Three Cheers for Ruth Graham

In her piece in the New York Times today, Ruth Graham captured something quite true: Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination is a cultural moment for conservative women. We don’t like to talk in terms of trailblazing, because these words have ideological implications. But we all remember the “mommy wars” when moms ... Read More
Media

Three Cheers for Ruth Graham

In her piece in the New York Times today, Ruth Graham captured something quite true: Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination is a cultural moment for conservative women. We don’t like to talk in terms of trailblazing, because these words have ideological implications. But we all remember the “mommy wars” when moms ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Inside the Mueller Farce

The publication of Andrew Weissmann’s book Where Law Ends: Inside the Mueller Investigation enables us to see what was always suspected by many to have been a fanatical determination on the part of the Mueller investigative team to destroy President Trump. The administration had to be destroyed because Mueller ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Inside the Mueller Farce

The publication of Andrew Weissmann’s book Where Law Ends: Inside the Mueller Investigation enables us to see what was always suspected by many to have been a fanatical determination on the part of the Mueller investigative team to destroy President Trump. The administration had to be destroyed because Mueller ... Read More