The Corner

Drezner On Huntington


Dan Drezner’s piece strikes me as fair and judicious. That does not, of

course, mean “correct.” I would seriously dispute a number of his points –

for example, that Mexico is redefining itself as a “North American” country.

It seem more likely to me that the cultural gap between us and them is

widening, not narrowing. (The economic gap — 2001 avge annual income: USA

$34,280, Mexico $5,530 — seems to be firmly stuck.)

Drezner’s point about there being different **kinds** of Hispanics also

skates a little too swiftly over the underlying issue there, which is of

course the r-word. Mexican society is highly stratified by race, with the

rulers being tall, European-featured and pale-skinned, while the subsistence

peasants at the bottom are more or less pure-blood Amerindian. The latter

group provides the majority of Mexican immigrants. There is, of course,

nothing wrong with being an Amerindian. The USA, however, has problems with

race. (Does anyone deny that statement?) It seems a little foolish to

import a NEW race problem, at least until we have fixed the old one.

Politics, however, is the art of the possible, and I find it hard to get

excited over these large cultural speculations. I would be very happy just

to see the immigration issue addressed in a serious way by our politicians,

without any moral blackmail about “racism,” “nativism,” and similar

debate-stoppers. In fact, I’d be very happy if the U.S. govt just began to

enforce current immigration law in a whole-hearted way. Is that really too

much to ask? Yes, apparently it is.


The Latest