The Corner

Politics & Policy

New York Times Opinion Writer Slams Ivanka for Supporting the Rollback of a Useless EEOC Rule

In this New York Times screed against Ivanka Trump, Lindy West blames her for not stopping everything the President has done that West opposes—which, of course, is just about everything. 

Yet a big part of her fury focuses on Ivanka’s support of a move from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to rescind a pending regulation that would have required larger companies to report additional data related to their compensation practices.  The Obama Administration had claimed these new reporting requirements would discourage discriminatory practices and reduce the wage gap. 

Ms. Trump explained in a statement why she supported the Administration’s decision:  “Ultimately, while I believe the intention was good and agree that pay transparency is important, the proposed policy would not yield the intended results.”  West isn’t buying it and questions Ivanka’s commitment to helping women, in a most demeaning manner, writing: 

Ivanka Trump… is more a logo than a person, a scarecrow stuffed with branding, an heiress-turned-model-turned-multimillionaire’s-wife playacting as an authority on the challenges facing working women so that she can sell more pastel sheath dresses. 

West not only seems inappropriately vicious toward the first daughter, but she doesn’t bother to address the entirely legitimate reasons for why the EEOC rule was pulled.  These onerous new paperwork requirements would not only have been costly to businesses, but they could actually backfire on women and result in less workplace flexibility.  Here’s how the Independent Women’s Forum explained our concerns with the proposed rule in a letter to the EEOC: 

 . . . the EEO-1 report overlooks that general job flexibility (e.g., telework, predictable scheduling) is something highly valued by women. Many women, particularly those with children, are often willing to trade additional salary for a more customized work environment that suits their individual and family needs…. Employers will be less likely to accommodate requests for flexible or alternative work schedules or positions if they are concerned that government officials will be examining these data points and statistics without this important context, and passing judgment on their compensation practices.

West makes fun of Ivanka for being out of touch, but it’s West and too many other cheerleaders for regulations who seem unfamiliar with how managers and human resources departments actually operate, and how these requirements will work in practice. 

Carrie Lukas is the president of the Independent Women’s Forum.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Hillary Ruins the Plan

Editor’s note: Andrew C. McCarthy’s new book is Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency. This is the first in a series of excerpts.  There really was a collusion plot. It really did target our election system. It absolutely sought to usurp our capacity for ... Read More
Economy & Business

The Great Mystery

Kevin Williamson disputes my characterization of his riposte. He writes: I wrote that people can choose what kind of work they want to do, and what kind of services they want to consume, without any help from Michael. Kevin then accuses me of being a stouthearted defender of the “Real America.” If ... Read More

‘Good Verse, Bad Verse, and Chaos’

I love reading Sarah Ruden, and I’ve enjoyed the attention given to Walt Whitman in these pages over the last few days. Ruden gives the poet the back of her hand for being championed by — angels and ministers of grace, defend us! — intellectuals and professors, a poet “whom ordinary Americans most ... Read More