The Corner

Elizabeth Warren’s Argument

Isn’t it a bit like saying — and here I’m borrowing from something Tom Palmer wrote for National Review a few years back — that we owe everything we have to farmers, since we wouldn’t be able to earn anything without the food they produce, and therefore they have an unlimited right to demand money from us? Come to think of it, that is a rough description of the attitudes of most members of the Agriculture Committees.

Update: A colleague tracked down the review I had in mind, which ran in our Dec. 13, 2004, issue and concerned a book by Cass Sunstein making the same argument. Palmer writes, “Let’s see what else this theory would entail: If a doctor were to save my life, then, since the doctor would be responsible for my existence, and therefore for all of the liberty and wealth that I might enjoy or create henceforth, the doctor would have the right to decide what should happen with that liberty and that wealth, since without the doctor neither I, nor the liberty, nor the wealth would exist. In short, Sunstein’s ethical theory is just silly.”

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

White House

Rachel Maddow’s Turnberry Tale

To a certain kind of Rachel Maddow viewer, there are few more titillating preludes to a news segment than the one she delivered Monday: “If you have not seen it yet, you are going to want to sit down.” Maddow’s story began, as many of her stories do, with President Trump, this time focused on his hotel ... Read More

Thin the Herd Further, DNC

There’s an old joke often expressed well into banquets and conferences, where a speaker says, “We’re at the point where everything that needs to be said has been said, but not everyone has said it.” We’re already at that point with the Democratic primary debates. Tonight was a three-hour ordeal, and ... Read More