The Corner

Politics & Policy

There Are No Uniters in 2016 America

Elizabeth Warren went on something of a tirade against Donald Trump last night. This part in particular stuck out to me:

This is a perfect example of the sort of ubiquitous linguistic silliness to which we have become accustomed in the sorry age of the focus group. Of course Hillary Clinton’s election isn’t going to “unite” America. As it stands, Clinton and her team are slightly more popular than is the GOP, and they are probably ten points or so more popular than is Donald Trump. In consequence, she is almost certainly going to win the presidency in November. But that does not make her a compromise candidate or a magic healer, and nor does it change the fact that she’s an unpopular partisan in a deeply divided nation.

As the more astute political observers will have noticed over the past few decades, there exist a number of discrete social and political camps in this country, and they’re pretty implacably opposed to one another. As a result, it really doesn’t matter who wins in 2016; whatever happens, the result is going to upset just under half the people. Forget Clinton and Trump for a moment and imagine that the election had been between Rubio and Biden or Kasich and Sanders or Bush and O’Malley. Can you conceive of any outcome in those contests that didn’t leave more than 100 million citizens in a funk? I can’t.

This sort of happy talk is rife in politics. When President Obama proposes a new idea, he invariably pretends that his opponents’ dissent is driven not by disagreement on the merits but by a desire to “play politics” (he does this to Democrats as well as Republicans, including to Elizabeth Warren on the question of trade). And, when they want to get something done, the Republicans do the same thing. That, alas, is just how the game is played. Opposition from your side is principle; from the other it is obstruction. Factionalism on your side is welcome diversity; from the other it is a threat to national unity. And always — always — your candidate is the one who will unite the country, around your ideas, natch.

In a vacuum this doesn’t matter a great deal. Politics has attracted self-serving rhetoric from the earliest days of civilized man. But if we start to believe our own fumes we will lose sight of the proximate cause of our current trench warfare, which is not that “politics” is intruding upon our sunlit uplands or that Kulakian “dividers” are roaming the land sticking spanners into wheels, but that we have a hopelessly divided polity that is in possession of multiple conceptions of the good life, and that we are unwilling to address that fact by returning power to the local where it belongs. Because the Republican party is feckless and dull, Hillary Clinton will almost certainly be the next president of the United States. Depending on the scale of her win, she may even manage to get something done. But she won’t “unite” anybody, and the electorate will not move forward as one upon her ascension to the throne. The fundamentals run deep in America, and there are no magic words to dissolve them.

Most Popular

PC Culture

Hate-Crime Hoaxes Reflect America’s Sickness

On January 29, tabloid news site TMZ broke the shocking story that Jussie Smollett, a gay black entertainer and progressive activist, had been viciously attacked in Chicago. Two racist white men had fractured his rib, poured bleach on him, and tied a noose around his neck. As they were leaving, they shouted ... Read More
World

Ilhan Omar’s Big Lie

In a viral exchange at a congressional hearing last week, the new congresswoman from Minnesota, Ilhan Omar, who is quickly establishing herself as the most reprehensible member of the House Democratic freshman class despite stiff competition, launched into Elliott Abrams. She accused the former Reagan official ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Strange Paradoxes of Our Age

Modern prophets often say one thing and do another. Worse, they often advocate in the abstract as a way of justifying their doing the opposite in the concrete. The result is that contemporary culture abounds with the inexplicable — mostly because modern progressivism makes all sorts of race, class, and ... Read More
PC Culture

Fake Newspeople

This week, the story of the Jussie Smollett hoax gripped the national media. The story, for those who missed it, went something like this: The Empire actor, who is both black and gay, stated that on a freezing January night in Chicago, in the middle of the polar vortex, he went to a local Subway store to buy a ... Read More
U.S.

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More
Elections

One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders, the antique Brooklyn socialist who represents Vermont in the Senate, is not quite ready to retire to his lakeside dacha and so once again is running for the presidential nomination of a party to which he does not belong with an agenda about which he cannot be quite entirely ... Read More
PC Culture

Merciless Sympathy

Jussie Smollett’s phony hate-crime story could have been taken apart in 24 hours, except for one thing: Nobody wanted to be the first to call bullsh**. Who will bell the cat? Not the police, and I don’t blame them. Smollett is a vocal critic of President Donald Trump who checks two protected-category ... Read More
U.S.

Questions for Those Who Believed Jussie Smollett

The “we reported the Jussie Smollett case responsibly” contention has been blasted to smithereens. Twitter accounts and headlines in the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times reported as fact Jussie Smollett’s wildly implausible allegations, and many other journalists did so as ... Read More