The Corner

End of the Road for the Stem-Cell Lawsuit

This morning, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal in the long-running court casechallenging the Obama administration’s policy of funding research on embryonic stem cells.

The legal challenge, which has been winding its way through the courts since August 2009, has been based on the argument that embryonic-stem-cell research violates the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, a law that prohibits the federal government from funding research in which human embryos are created or destroyed. The stem-cell policy that President Obama put in place in 2009 permits federal funding for research on new lines of stem cells that were created (without federal funding) by destroying embryos donated by in vitro fertilization patients.

The case might have been made moot had Mitt Romney won in November and announced plans to change the policy, but with an Obama victory and a defeat in the courts, the federal government seems set to continue funding research on the products of destroyed human embryos for at least the next four years.

In the meantime, research on alternatives to embryonic stem cells, particularly on the induced pluripotent stem cells invented by Nobel laureate Shinya Yamanaka in 2007, offers the chance for the life-saving medical promise of stem cells to be advanced without destroying nascent human life. As a major report on the stem-cell debatesreleased last year by the Witherspoon Council on Ethics and the Integrity of Science argued, “the potential circumvention of the embryonic stem cell controversy by scientific advances shows how conflicts between ethics and science need not always be irreconcilable.”

The example of the stem-cell debates shows that scientific progress, rightly understood and directed, can help to resolve some of the ethical problems that science itself raises. Defenders of human life should continue to make their strong ethical case for pursuing medical science without destroying embryonic human life — a case that, after today’s Supreme Court decision, will need to return to the political arena.

— Brendan P. Foht is assistant editor of The New Atlantis: A Journal of Technology & Society.

Most Popular


In Defense of Coleman Hughes

Picture the scene: A young man walks into a congressional hearing to offer witness testimony. His grandfather was barbarically brutalized by people who are now long dead. The nation in which he resides built its wealth of his grandfather’s brutalization. The question: Should his fellow citizens pay the young ... Read More

College Leaders Should Learn from Oberlin

Thanks to their social-justice warrior mindset, the leaders of Oberlin College have caused an Ohio jury to hit it with $44 million in compensatory and punitive damages in a case where the school couldn't resist the urge to side with its “woke” students against a local business. College leaders should learn ... Read More
Film & TV

Toy Story 4: A National Anthem

The Toy Story franchise is the closest thing we have to an undisputed national anthem, a popular belief that celebrates what we think we all stand for — cooperation, ingenuity, and simple values, such as perpetual hope. This fact of our infantile, desensitized culture became apparent back in 2010 when I took a ... Read More

Joe and the Segs

Joe Biden has stepped in it, good and deep. Biden, if he has any hope of ever being elected president, will be dependent on residual goodwill among African Americans from his time as Barack Obama’s loyal and deferential vice president — so deferential, in fact, that he stood aside for Herself in 2016 even ... Read More

Have a Good Day

Years ago, there was a movie, The Longest Day, about the Normandy landings. Today, June 21, is, I believe, the longest day of the year. Is it the best day of the year? Well, I like “fall back,” when we gain an hour. I begin my latest episode of Music for a While with “A Soft Day,” one of my favorite ... Read More