The Corner

EPA’s Not Seeking 230,000 New Bureaucrats

A Daily Caller story citing an EPA estimate that it would require an additional 230,000 bureaucrats at a cost of $21 billion to regulate greenhouse gases is getting quite a bit of play (including on NRO).  But the Daily Caller flubbed the story.  The EPA is not “asking for taxpayers to shoulder” this burden, as the Daily Caller story claims.  Rather, the EPA is pointing out applying the plain text of the Clean Air Act to greenhouse gas emissions would require this result — and the EPA is correct on this point.  The EPA’s response is not to confess that trying to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act is absurd, however.  Instead the EPA is seeking to rewrite the statute by administrative fiat.  This, and not the outrageous cost estimates, are where EPA goes wrong.

The only real solution is legislative action to correct the Supreme Court’s erroneous conclusion in Massachusetts v. EPA that the Clean Air Act covers greenhouse gases in the first place. Until this decision is overturned or the law is amended, however, over one million additional facilities are subject to the Act’s permitting requirements, and processing that number of permits would, in fact, require at least a ten-fold increase in EPA personnel, and it is neither fair nor accurate to attack the EPA for pointing this out.  There are many things worth attacking the EPA for, but this isn’t one of them.  If blame lies anywhere, it’s with the justices on the Supreme Court whose decision led to this result.

I have more to say on this at the VC.  I also provide background on this regulatory mess in this article from the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy.

Jonathan H. Adler is the Johan Verhiej Memorial Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Business Law and Regulation at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law.

Most Popular

Sports

It’s Time for Colin Kaepernick to Move On

Colin Kaepernick. Remember him? Below-average quarterback. Above-average poseur. Not “activist,” not really. Activists actually say stuff. Kaepernick almost never says anything. He’s like the Queen or most popes — you have to read the deep-background musings of supposed members of his inner circle to get ... Read More
U.S.

What The 1619 Project Leaves Out

“The goal of The 1619 Project, a major initiative from The New York Times that this issue of the magazine inaugurates, is to reframe American history by considering what it would mean to regard 1619 as our nation’s birth year,” The New York Times Magazine editors declare. “Doing so requires us to place ... Read More
Elections

Trump and the Black Vote

"Donald Trump is a racist, white supremacist, white nationalist. So are his supporters." Some version of that refrain is heard almost hourly somewhere in mainstream media. Democratic politicians seem to proclaim it more often than that. Listening only to the Left, you'd conclude that more than half a ... Read More
PC Culture

Courage Is the Cure for Political Correctness

This might come as some surprise to observers of our campus culture wars, but there was a time, not long ago, when the situation in American higher education was much worse. There a wave of vicious campus activism aimed at silencing heterodox speakers, and it was typically empowered by a comprehensive regime of ... Read More
U.S.

The Age of Miscalculation

On August 7, 1998, more than 200 people were killed in terrorist attacks on U.S. embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. Americans learned three names most of them never had heard before: Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden, and al-Qaeda. On August 20, 1998, President Bill Clinton ordered a ... Read More