The Corner

More Abuse of Statistics by ‘Equal Pay’ Advocates

When activists feel that they have too small an audience, a standard tactic is to start claiming that their niche issue speaks to some greater cause. For example, diversity on college campuses is no longer just a matter of affirmative action – it’s essential for learning. Same-sex marriage is not merely an issue of social justice — it’s for public health.” Common Core isn’t just a set of rigorous school standards – it’s a national-security imperative. The list of dubious claims goes on and on.

Enter the National Partnership for Women and Families. The organization has been heavily promoting “Equal Pay Day” and calling for an end to the gender wage gap. But its cause is not just gender equity, you see — it’s the health of our economy in general. From one of its fact sheets:

On average, women employed full time in the United States lose a combined total of nearly $500 billion every year due to the wage gap. These women, their families, businesses and the economy suffer as a result. Lost wages mean families have less money to save for the future or to spend on basic goods and services – spending that helps drive the economy.

But the $500 billion is not somehow lost to the economy. Gender discrimination would redistribute the money to employers and male employees, who would in turn “drive the economy” by spending it. Redistributing money can reduce efficiency — as an income tax does, for example — but it does not make the entire amount disappear!

Of course, as Carrie Lukas has already pointed out for NR, the wage gap is misleading, as it does not control for the different skills, occupations, and life choices made by women. When pressed, advocates say controls can’t explain all of the difference, and then they go on citing the raw difference as if it meant something.

So advocates start with a false premise (women suffer massive wage discrimination), then draw a conclusion (lost wages disappear from the economy) that would not follow even if the premise were true. It’s a double dose of illogic on Equal Pay Day.

Jason Richwine is a public-policy analyst and a contributor to National Review Online.

Most Popular

Film & TV

A Sad Finale

Spoilers Ahead. Look, I share David’s love of Game of Thrones. But I thought the finale was largely a bust, for failings David mostly acknowledges in passing (but does not allow to dampen his ardor). The problems with the finale were largely the problems of this entire season. Characters that had been ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Great Misdirection

The House Democrats are frustrated, very frustrated. They’ve gotten themselves entangled in procedural disputes with the Trump administration that no one particularly cares about and that might be litigated for a very long time. A Washington Post report over the weekend spelled out how stymied Democrats ... Read More

Australia’s Voters Reject Leftist Ideas

Hell hath no fury greater than left-wingers who lose an election in a surprise upset. Think Brexit in 2016. Think Trump’s victory the same year. Now add Australia. Conservative prime minister Scott Morrison shocked pollsters and pundits alike with his victory on Saturday, and the reaction has been brutal ... Read More
NR Webathon

We’ve Had Bill Barr’s Back

One of the more dismaying features of the national political debate lately is how casually and cynically Attorney General Bill Barr has been smeared. He is routinely compared to Roy Cohn on a cable-TV program that prides itself on assembling the most thoughtful and plugged-in political analysts and ... Read More