The Corner

Eskridge, The Book

What’s the worst thing a same-sex marriage advocate could say to damage his own case? Well, he might throw in his lot with the folks up in Canada who are trying to replace marriage with a “non-conjugal” domestic partnership system. Or he might tout the sexually open unions of gay male couples as an advance over current marital norms. William Eskridge and Darren Spedale do both of these things in their new book, Gay Marriage: For Better or For Worse? (I’ll refer hereafter to first-author Eskridge alone.)

Today, in “No Nordic Bliss” I respond to an earlier article by Eskridge critiquing my work on marriage in Scandinavia. Eskridge has now expanded that article into a book on same-sex marriage in Europe (chiefly Denmark), and I’ve been working my way through an advance copy.

I’m a bit taken aback by the radicalism of this book Eskridge encourages supporters of same-sex marriage to ally with anti-marriage radicals. He suggests that at least one American state should adopt a comprehensive “non-marriage” partnership regime of the type backed by Canadian marriage abolitionists. Eskridge offers this report by Brenda Crossman as an example.

And while Eskridge appears “conservative” when claiming that Scandinavian registered partnerships may foster monogamy, he’s positively enthusiastic about gay Danish couples with sexually open marriages. Here’s a quote:

“Of course, not all couples in relationships choose to practice monogamy. Several of the partnered gay men we spoke with were not monogamous. They were open about this with their partners, which is something of an advance over the twentieth-century marital norm of repeated, but secret, cheating….” (p. 147)

No polyamorist could have said it better. The idea that open and honest sex with multiple partners is better than a fallible monogamy is the central plank in the emerging case for multi-partner marriage. Eskridge says conservatives are mistaken to think that same-sex marriages will undermine monogamy. He doesn’t seem to realize that his own approval of sexually open gay unions does exactly that.

I’ll have a more thorough critique of the Eskridge book in the future. In his original article, Eskridge totally ignores the two countries at the center of my causal case on gay marriage: Norway and The Netherlands. In his new book, Eskridge finally says something (very brief) about both countries. Yet both accounts are highly unsatisfactory. For example, Eskridge ignores my regional analysis of Norway, a key to my causal case there. He likewise avoids central points in my treatment of The Netherlands, the place where the causal effect of same-sex marriage can be isolated most clearly. (See “Standing Out.”) Still, the Eskridge book focuses overwhelmingly on Sweden and Norway, and I’m satisfied that my piece for NRO today responds to Eskridge’s core points regarding those two countries. I’ll have more to say about the new book soon. But what stuns me is the degree to which the book defends same-sex marriage by attacking marriage itself.

Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

The Sinking Collusion Ship

The entire Trump-Russia collusion narrative was always implausible. One, the Washington swamp of fixers such as Paul Manafort and John and Tony Podesta was mostly bipartisan and predated Trump. Two, the Trump administration’s Russia policies were far tougher on Vladimir Putin than were those of Barack ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Problem with Certainty

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including those of you having this read to you while you white-knuckle the steering wheel trying to get to wherever you’re going for the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Worst Cover-Up of All Time

President Donald Trump may be guilty of many things, but a cover-up in the Mueller probe isn’t one of them. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, attempting to appease forces in the Democratic party eager for impeachment, is accusing him of one, with all the familiar Watergate connotations. The charge is strange, ... Read More

Theresa May: A Political Obituary

On Friday, Theresa May, perhaps the worst Conservative prime minister in recent history, announced her resignation outside of number 10 Downing Street. She will step down effective June 7. “I have done my best,” she insisted. “I have done everything I can. . . . I believe it was right to persevere even ... Read More
PC Culture

TV Before PC

Affixing one’s glance to the rear-view mirror is usually as ill-advised as staring at one’s own reflection. Still, what a delight it was on Wednesday to see a fresh rendition of “Those Were the Days,” from All in the Family, a show I haven’t watched for nearly 40 years. This time it was Woody Harrelson ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Democrats’ Other Class War

There is a class war going on inside the Democratic party. Consider these two cris de couer: Writing in the New York Times under the headline “America’s Cities Are Unlivable — Blame Wealthy Liberals,” Farhad Manjoo argues that rich progressives have, through their political domination of cities such as ... Read More

The Deepfake of Nancy Pelosi

You’ve almost made it to a three-day weekend! Making the click-through worthwhile: A quick note about how National Review needs your help, concerns about “deepfakes” of Nancy Pelosi, one of the most cringe-inducing radio interviews of all time, some news about where to find me and the book in the near ... Read More

America’s Best Defense Against Socialism

The United States of America has flummoxed socialists since the nineteenth century. Marx himself couldn’t quite understand why the most advanced economy in the world stubbornly refused to transition to socialism. Marxist theory predicts the immiseration of the proletariat and subsequent revolution from below. ... Read More