The Corner

An Etymology Lesson

It is one thing to plead for more civil political rhetoric, which of course would be good. It is quite another to say that we should purge words and phrases that have military origins, which would be practically impossible. Many commonplace terms started on the battlefield. “Strategy” comes from the Greek strategia, meaning “generalship.” “Leadership” has an Indo-European root meaning “to go forth, die.” “Campaign,” from the Latin campus (“field”), began as a military term for an organized struggle taking place over a distinct period. “Slogan” derives from the Scottish Gaelic sluagh (“army”) and ghairm (“cry”).

A ban on martial language would rule out many quotations from historical figures. When he accepted the 1912 presidential nomination of the Progressive Party, Theodore Roosevelt proclaimed, “We stand at Armageddon, and we battle for the Lord.” His distant cousin Franklin said in his 1933 inaugural that he assumed “unhesitatingly the leadership of this great army of our people dedicated to a disciplined attack upon our common problems.” And Lyndon Johnson declared “War on Poverty.”

Even when they’ve opposed war, political leaders have used the language of war. In his memoir of the 1972 presidential bid of George McGovern — whose main issue was Vietnam — campaign manager Gary Hart said: “The nomination campaign was for us guerrilla warfare – scattered, ragtag troops, minutemen, roving bands of citizen volunteers, the people of Russia plaguing and harassing Napoleon’s elite corps.” In his famous 2002 speech against the invasion of Iraq, Barack Obama said: “Let’s fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn’t simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil. Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join.”

John J. Pitney Jr. is the Roy P. Crocker professor of American politics at Claremont McKenna College.

Most Popular

White House

Democrats in Peril

I will just make a prediction and try to keep out of the swamp of Trump-obsession as the weeks unfold. The anti-Trump movement is now in inexorable decline; it is a little like the Nixon defense forces after the Saturday Night drama in October 1973, with the departure of the attorney general, his deputy, and ... Read More

Trump and the North Korean Tipping Point

The world has been stunned by North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un’s announcement last week that he was suspending his country’s nuclear tests in preparation for the impending meeting with President Trump. Even critics have had to concede that Trump’s bellicose rhetoric since last summer regarding the North ... Read More
Politics & Policy

E Pluribus . . . Gridlock

A mantra we hear everywhere these days is that diversity is a good thing. And no doubt, it is. Diversity facilitates an exchange of ideas and opinions, and it promotes economic growth. Moreover, the alternative to diversity is to suppress the views and opinions of some subset of citizens, which is completely ... Read More
Economy & Business

Trade Misunderstandings

I was distracted by other policy topics last week but not enough not to notice Peter Navarro’s article in the Wall Street Journal, headlined “China’s Faux Comparative Advantage.” Considering Navarro’s position in the White House, it is unfortunate that it demonstrates some serious misunderstandings ... Read More