The Corner

The EU vs. Microsoft, Part 735,094,378 (And Counting)

Any time you hear bureaucrats—especially European bureaucrats—whining about a company refusing to give its competitors a “fair deal,” you can pretty much bet you’re about to be smacked in the face with a wet towel of regulatory nonsense.  But alas, the New York Times is reporting that, once again, European regulators are getting their undies in a bunch over Microsoft’s alleged antitrust violations. 

The feud between Microsoft and the EU has been active for some time now, and like most feuds, how it started doesn’t matter much.  All that’s important is that Microsoft is successful—very successful—and EU regulators find that distasteful. Success? What gall!

They’re not big on singular corporate success of any kind, of course, but especially not from an American company.  Subsequently, their solution has been to force Microsoft to make design changes in its products (as if somehow we need EU bureaucrats designing software for us) and, more recently, to order it to open its code to its competitors in a misguided quest for “interoperability.” 

Orders like this are billed as fostering competition and innovation.  But how, I wonder, does signaling to companies that 1) they could at any time be forced to give out proprietary information to competitors and 2) letting start ups get by without developing new systems/infrastructures/products of their own really spur innovation?  Free rides on the competition create disincentives for companies to create new, better products and systems of their own.  (Adam Thierer and Wayne Crews have a helpful summary of the perils of various types of “open access” regulations here.)

I don’t know that Microsoft will get out of this mess without acceding to the regulators—sometimes corporations have to force a grin and do a song and dance routine to appease the bureaucrats—but the continued demands placed upon Microsoft by EU bureaucrats have become rather exasperating.  (Nor, I should add, have they managed to leave Apple alone either.) 

NR Staff — Members of the National Review editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

Most Popular

White House

The Problem Isn’t Just the GOP, Mr. Comey

During a CNN town hall on Wednesday night, James Comey alleged that the Republican party allows President Trump to get away with making inappropriate statements without holding him accountable. “If the Republicans, if they just close their eyes and imagine Barack Obama waking up in the morning saying someone ... Read More
Law & the Courts

‘Judges for the #Resistance’

At Politico, I wrote today about the judiciary’s activism against Trump on immigration: There is a lawlessness rampant in the land, but it isn’t emanating from the Trump administration. The source is the federal judges who are making a mockery of their profession by twisting the law to block the Trump ... Read More
White House

Trump’s Friendships Are America’s Asset

The stale, clichéd conceptions of Donald Trump held by both Left and Right — a man either utterly useless or only rigidly, transactionally tolerable — conceal the fact that the president does possess redeeming talents that are uniquely his, and deserve praise on their own merit. One is personal friendliness ... Read More

Columbia 1968: Another Untold Story

Fifty years ago this week, Columbia students riding the combined wave of the civil-rights and anti-war movements went on strike, occupied buildings across campus, and shut the university down. As you revisit that episode of the larger drama that was the annus horribilis 1968, bear in mind that the past isn’t ... Read More

Only the Strident Survive

‘I am not prone to anxiety,” historian Niall Ferguson wrote in the Times of London on April 22. “Last week, however, for the first time since I went through the emotional trauma of divorce, I experienced an uncontrollable panic attack.” The cause? “A few intemperate emails, inadvertently forwarded ... Read More