The Corner

Politics & Policy

Euphemisms and More

Former Rep. Beto O’Rourke speaks during the first night of the second Democratic presidential debate in Detroit, Mich., July 30, 2019. (Lucas Jackson/Reuters)

Beto O’Rourke has come out for “mandatory buybacks” of firearms.

Apparently, that is the euphemism we are meant to use now: “mandatory buybacks.”

A party cannot buy back that which it never owned, and a transaction that is mandatory is not an exchange at all, but a seizure. We should call things what they are. That might help us to understand why such proposals are unconstitutional on at least two fronts.

I am also not sold on my friend David French’s “red flag law” argument. I do not think that we can or should suspend the constitutional rights of people who have not arrested and have not been charged with any crime, much less convicted of one. We would not countenance such a treatment of the First Amendment. My understanding of “prior restraint” in regard to the First Amendment is permitted only in the case of “inevitable, direct, and immediate danger”; a similar standard applied to the Second Amendment (assuming, arguendo, that such a standard is appropriate for the First) would be almost useless inasmuch as the mere possession of a firearm does not make any violent outcome “inevitable.”

If we are to have the rule of law, then we must maintain the rule of law and be ruled by it — even when we are terrified, frustrated, or mourning. We should not allow ourselves to be buffaloed into giving up the Bill of Rights.

In Chicago at last check, those arrested for illegal possession of a firearm stand a four-out-of-five chance of escaping conviction on the charge. Many are never tried. In much of the country, straw buyers in firearms cases are effectively immune from federal prosecution, and often from local prosecution. There is no effort made to collect the firearms improperly sold because of defects in the background-check system. Etc. Acts of terrorism such as the one perpetrated in El Paso constitute a vanishingly small part of the criminal violence committed our country; the vast majority of the shootings are the very ones that might be diminished by the competent enforcement of our laws, including our firearms laws.

We should try that before abandoning the Bill of Rights.

Most Popular


What The 1619 Project Leaves Out

“The goal of The 1619 Project, a major initiative from The New York Times that this issue of the magazine inaugurates, is to reframe American history by considering what it would mean to regard 1619 as our nation’s birth year,” The New York Times Magazine editors declare. “Doing so requires us to place ... Read More

It’s Time for Colin Kaepernick to Move On

Colin Kaepernick. Remember him? Below-average quarterback. Above-average poseur. Not “activist,” not really. Activists actually say stuff. Kaepernick almost never says anything. He’s like the Queen or most popes — you have to read the deep-background musings of supposed members of his inner circle to get ... Read More
PC Culture

Courage Is the Cure for Political Correctness

This might come as some surprise to observers of our campus culture wars, but there was a time, not long ago, when the situation in American higher education was much worse. There a wave of vicious campus activism aimed at silencing heterodox speakers, and it was typically empowered by a comprehensive regime of ... Read More

Trump and the Black Vote

"Donald Trump is a racist, white supremacist, white nationalist. So are his supporters." Some version of that refrain is heard almost hourly somewhere in mainstream media. Democratic politicians seem to proclaim it more often than that. Listening only to the Left, you'd conclude that more than half a ... Read More