…there’s a dark cloud. I just got an email from a listener asking “Who will take Kerry’s place when he drops out?”
Hey, it wouldn’t be the first time for the Democrats. Remember New Jersey?
So, let’s say that CBS’s source on the bogus memos has a direct, indisputable link to Kerry. If so, the election is over…and it’s not even October.
Why would the Democrats stick with a guaranteed loser? Why wouldn’t they push Kerry out, pressure him to resign, etc? It certainly wouldn’t make sense to wrap a dying Kerry campaign around the necks of Democrat house or senate campaigns.
Has my paranoia gotten to me, or is this the obvious outcome if Kerry’s fingerprints are on the Dan Rather memos?