The Corner

The White House Is Flexing Its Crony Muscles

In one the biggest flip-flops of the last eight years, President Obama has gone from calling the Export-Import Bank “little more than a fund for corporate welfare” to being one of its biggest cheerleaders. The White House’s latest move to restore the Ex-Im Bank’s full lending authority is to demand that the law be changed (to allow the agency to approve loans over $10 million without having to comply with the necessary three-board-member quorum requirement) and included in a must-pass bill. That’s right, after using its propaganda machine last summer and fall to get Ex-Im reauthorized, the White House is now circulating a list of items it would like to see in the next continuing resolution including:

The White House further wants to address a controversy that has stymied the work of the Export-Import Bank. Senate Republicans have refused to fill a vacancy on the bank’s board, leaving the bank without the quorum of three board members required to approve transactions of more than $10 million.

The administration wants language in the CR to amend the bank’s statutory requirement that its board have a quorum to take any action. While Congress reauthorized the bank in a year-end omnibus appropriations act in 2015, the bank’s operations have been significantly hampered and a number of U.S. companies have moved overseas as a result, the OMB request said.

So basically, since some lawmakers have been unable to use the regular process to restore the full lending authority of the bank, the White House wants to change the law to go around the process.

In doing so, it is following in the steps of others crony-friendly lawmakers, such as Representative Charlie Dent (R, Penn.), who have resorted to good old shenanigans to slip an amendment into an unrelated appropriations bill to change the rules of the bank’s quorum requirement, loosening an important check on corporate welfare. Never mind that Speaker Ryan had promised a few weeks before that, under his watch, this type of thing wouldn’t happen anymore.

What will Ryan do? We don’t know yet. But whatever he does will go a long way toward signaling how committed he is — or not — to free-markets as opposed to cronyism.

Finally, I would like to point to the laughable claim that “a number of U.S companies have moved overseas as a result” of our victory again cronyism. What’s the word for “misleading on steroids”? Seriously, the only company that alleged it was forced to move overseas as a result of the Ex-Im is GE. However, all its claims about why it was moving a factory to Canada and doing even more business in France than it already was were shown, repeatedly, to be totally unrelated to Ex-Im. Even when Ex-Im was alive and kicking, GE had more jobs abroad than in the U.S. And don’t forget: Boeing’s threats to move abroad were empty, too.

Veronique de Rugy — Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Did Flynn Lie?

At the outset, let’s get two things straight: First, there is something deeply disturbing about the Obama administration’s decision to open a counterintelligence investigation on retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn while he was working on the Trump campaign — and, ultimately, about the Justice ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Where Is the Flynn 302?

Better late than never (I hope), my weekend column has posted on the website. It deals with the question whether General Michael Flynn actually lied to the FBI agents — including the now infamous Peter Strzok — when they interviewed him in the White House on his third day on the job as national security ... Read More

G-File Mailbag: The Results of a Bad Idea

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including those of you just standing there eating Zarg nuts), I had a bad idea. It wasn’t a terrible idea, like asking a meth addict ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Collusion Scenario

It has become an article of faith in some quarters on the right -- well, most -- that the Mueller investigation has found no evidence of collusion with Russia and has accordingly shifted gears to process crimes like lying to the FBI or obstruction of justice. Having decided that this must be true, many have ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Who’s in Charge Here?

In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump was asked on many occasions whether he would “accept the results” of the election if he were to lose. Democrats and their media allies demanded that he make a solemn vow to “accept the results.” It was never entirely clear what anybody thought ... Read More