The Corner

The Fabled ‘Grand Deal’ on Tax Reform

Reuters distributed a dispatch this morning on the politics of tax reform. Why is it proving to be so hard to assemble an effective political coalition for fundamental tax reform like the one Ronald Reagan assembled in 1986? Some reasons offered:

First, glaring loopholes are fewer today; second, the deficit’s size blocks agreement on revenue neutrality; third, Reagan raised corporate taxes, but this is harder now; and fourth, a lower capital gains rate is more deeply entrenched.

Some of the analysts quoted in the story make good points, but for fiscal conservatives there’s an equally important question to ponder: Why didn’t the 1986 tax deal stick? Its top tax rate lasted only a few years, until Pres. George Bush and the Democratic Congress hiked it. Bill Clinton and the Democrats hiked it, again. George W. Bush’s subsequent tax cuts, which liberals describe as an irresponsible giveaway to the wealthy, still left the top marginal rate significantly above the rate Reagan achieved in 1986 through what would supposed to be a grand, historic deal.

Furthermore, looking back on it now, the 1986 tax reform contained grave errors in the tax treatment of investment (via corporate and capital-gain taxes). Those elements deserved to unravel over time. Now most free-market analysts would argue that tax neutrality requires a zero rate on corporate income and capital gains, if income to shareholders and the principal of investments are taxed. Otherwise, you are layering multiple taxes on the same stream of income as it gets hit at the business and personal level and the return on investment is hit at the beginning (by reducing the amount of principal invested) and the end (by reducing the dividends or capital gains earned on the principal).

I would submit that conservatives should be wary of making grand deals on taxes, and opt instead for gradual steps consistent with our overall goals. Grand deals can cost taxpayers dearly in the long run by broadening the tax bases without hard caps on subsequent increases in rates. We are also better off increasing the extent to which voting citizens pay their taxes directly and annually — so they are more likely to know how much government costs them — rather than having them pay indirectly, through corporate income or VATs, and in never-tallied dribs and drabs, through sales tax.

Americans don’t much like paying any taxes, but they are particularly incensed by property and income taxes. Smart liberals know that and figure that hiking state and local sales taxes and creating a new federal VAT will help them drive the overall tax burden closer to the European average. Smart conservatives should not help them.

John Hood — John Hood is president of the John William Pope Foundation, a Raleigh-based grantmaker that supports public policy organizations, educational institutions, arts and cultural programs, and humanitarian relief in North Carolina ...

Most Popular

PC Culture

America Is Intolerably Intolerant

When you think of the sheer vindictiveness of what happened to Oklahoma quarterback Kyler Murray, it takes your breath away. On the very night of his greatest career triumph, a reporter dug up his old tweets (composed when he was a young teenager), reported on the most offensive insults, and immediately and ... Read More
Politics & Policy

How Democrats Can Blow It in 2020

Donald Trump probably can’t win the 2020 presidential election, but the Democrats can lose it. What I mean is that in a contest between Trump and a generic Democrat, Trump would almost surely lose if the current political climate holds through 2020. According to a Fox News poll this week, 38 percent of ... Read More
Film & TV

Clint Eastwood’s Unforgettable Curtain Call

At 88, Clint Eastwood seldom appears on screen anymore and last acted in a movie in 2012’s mediocre Trouble with the Curve. So the final images of The Mule may be the last we see of him at the movies. If so, what an exit: understated perfection, with a playful hint of subverting his screen image. The Mule is ... Read More