The Corner

Law & the Courts

No, Federal Officials Shouldn’t Misrepresent Gang Affiliations to Facilitate Deportation

ICE agents detain a man during an operation targeting street gangs in Dallas, Tex., in 2014. (Charles Reed/ICE/Handout via Reuters)

Let’s begin with a simple proposition. Two things can be true at once. First, it can be true and right and necessary for federal officials to prioritize gang members for deportation. I have no desire for illegal aliens who are actual members of gangs like MS-13 to stay in the United States. At the same time, we need to be aware that a good thing — the effort to deport illegal alien gang members — can quickly morph into something far more nefarious if it incentivizes unscrupulous federal officials to lie or mislead courts.

And that seems to be exactly what happened in the case of Daniel Ramirez Medina, a DACA recipient who faced deportation in spite of a clean criminal record. Rather than honor his DACA status, the federal government arbitrarily and without evidence declared him “gang-affiliated,” and tried to kick him out of the country — at least until a federal judge stepped in. Mark Joseph Stern at Slate has the details, but I’d encourage you to read the court’s order for yourself. This paragraph stands out:

Most troubling to the Court, is the continued assertion that Mr. Ramirez is gang-affiliated, despite providing no evidence specific to Mr. Ramirez to the Immigration Court in connection with his administrative proceedings, and offering no evidence to this Court to support its assertions four months later. Indeed, the Immigration Judge, after reviewing all evidence submitted by respondent, that Mr. Ramirez was credible, and that he was not in a gang or associated with one. (Citations omitted.)

The court not only ordered Ramirez’s DACA status restored, it enjoined the government from “asserting, adopting, or relying in any proceedings on any statement or record made as of this date purporting to allege or establish that Mr. Ramirez is a gang member, gang affiliated, or a threat to public safety.”

In the polite language of court decisions, this is strong stuff. And while it is just one case, it should serve as a warning for federal officials who may be tempted to circumvent the Constitution or exploit the administration’s enforcement priorities. Allegations aren’t proof, and no person (including DACA recipients) can be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular


Road Trip

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Especially future contributors to my GoFundMe page), I am currently in the passenger seat of our family fun mobile, passing mile marker ... Read More

The Maker of Middle-earth, in Gorgeous Detail

Oxford, England — After five months of ferocious and futile slaughter in “the Great War,” an Oxford undergraduate — knowing his deployment to the Western Front was inevitable — used his Christmas break in 1914 to cultivate his imagination. Twenty-two-year-old J. R. R. Tolkien began writing “The Story ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Answering my Critics

My post on Elizabeth Warren’s cynical/bonkers proposal to effectively nationalize every American firm with revenue of $1 billion or more has met with predictable criticism. I will address two points here. One, some have complained about the use of the word “expropriation,” or more broadly about ... Read More

Winslow Homer’s Art, through the Camera Lens

The Bowdoin College Museum of Art's show Winslow Homer and the Camera takes a perceptive, original look at one of America's great art visionaries. It's special for many reasons. It takes a much-considered artist — Homer (1836–1910) is among the gods atop the heap of American artists — and finally makes ... Read More