The Corner

Economy & Business

Don’t Run Hot, Run Stable

Karl Smith makes the case that the Fed should let the economy run hot. It should hold off on raising interest rates, even if its restraint causes an increase in inflation. That looser-money policy would have the beneficial effect of boosting employment and wages. It would also train markets to expect that periods in which inflation falls below the Fed’s target of 2 percent inflation will be followed by periods in which it exceeds it. So the next recession will be moderated by expectations of higher inflation to follow it.

Last year Lawrence Summers made a similar argument, suggesting that the Fed should let inflation run above target during a boom “with the expectation that inflation will decline during the next recession.”

I’m agnostic on whether the Fed should be pursuing a modestly tighter or looser policy at the present moment. It’s much more important, in my view, that whatever short-term policy it adopts be part of a shift toward a long-term policy based on commitment to a sound rule.

But the right rule—one that kept the growth of spending throughout the economy steady—would differ from what Smith is recommending in two ways. First, it would not attempt to boost employment, wages, or economic growth, but rather to provide a context of monetary stability. Second, it would yield lower inflation during booms and higher inflation during busts, the opposite of the Smith/Summers suggestion. If the Fed kept spending rising at 4 percent, inflation would hit 1.5 percent while the economy grew 2.5 percent and 4 percent during a no-growth year. Inflation would in other words be counter-cyclical.

In a sense, both of these differences are really one difference. What I’m saying is that the Fed’s proper role is not to make the economy run alternately hot and cold but, so far as possible, to avoid doing that.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More
Film & TV

Joker: An Honest Treatment of Madness

When I saw that the New York Times and The New Yorker had run columns berating the new Joker movie, criticizing it not simply on cinematic grounds but instead insisting that the film amounted to a clandestine defense of “whiteness” in an attempt to buttress the electoral aim of “Republicans” — this is a ... Read More
Culture

The Origins of the Transgender Movement

Editor’s Note: This article has been adapted from remarks delivered at a Heritage Foundation summit. I’ve been asked to talk about the origins of transgenderism and how it relates to children and their exploitation. But first, I would like to start with a little story. Yesterday I was wandering around ... Read More
Elections

The Democrats’ Disastrous CNN LGBT Town Hall

A few days after Donald Trump committed the worst foreign-policy blunder of his presidency by betraying America’s Kurdish allies in northern Syria, former vice president Joe Biden, the elder statesman and co-frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary, was on a national stage talking to CNN’s primetime ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More