The Corner

Filibuster Bluster

In the Washington Post, Harold Meyerson attacks the Senate filibuster: “A more corrosive attack on the first principle of democracy, that of majority rule, is hard to conceive.” Not long ago, however, he thought that filibustering was just dandy.  After the GOP regained the Senate majority in 2002, he wrote: “Only the filibuster now stands between the nation and the unchecked rule of the most right-wing, xenophobic and belligerent administration in the nation’s history.” Two years later, he lamented further Republican gains: “With the number of Democrats in the Senate reduced to 44 (45 counting fellow traveler Jim Jeffords), it will be harder for the Dems to sustain filibusters against forthcoming Bush Supreme Court appointments and the other mischief soon to come upon us.” A few months after that, he worried that Republicans might try to change McCain-Feingold. If such a move got past GOP disharmony and McCain’s opposition, he said, “the Democrats would have to apply the third brake: a Senate filibuster.”

Most Popular

Film & TV

A Sad Finale

Spoilers Ahead. Look, I share David’s love of Game of Thrones. But I thought the finale was largely a bust, for failings David mostly acknowledges in passing (but does not allow to dampen his ardor). The problems with the finale were largely the problems of this entire season. Characters that had been ... Read More
Film & TV

Game of Thrones: A Father’s Legacy Endures

Warning! If you don't want to read any spoilers from last night's series finale of Game of Thrones, stop reading. Right now. There is a lot to unpack about the Thrones finale, and I fully understand many of the criticisms I read on Twitter and elsewhere. Yes, the show was compressed. Yes, there were moments ... Read More