The Corner

For Following the Conclave


For anyone who’s interested, here are a couple of very helpful resources. Robert Moynihan’s website The Moynihan Letters covers what’s being talked about in Rome, and is frequently updated with current gossip. (Today’s dispatch is one of the meatiest and most interesting.) And the National Catholic Reporter is flooding the zone with conclave coverage: Check out the “Latest Posts” in the lower right-hand corner, and also John Allen’s series of “Papabile of the Day” articles — detailed analyses of the pros and cons of the candidates.

Allen’s enemies won’t let him live down the fact that he got 2005 wrong; he didn’t think Ratzinger was going to win. Don’t let that mislead you: He’s a fantastic reporter with good sources, who happened to get beat to that story by the guy from Time magazine. (The story here. Also, be sure to mention this story every time somebody tries to tell you that the process is fundamentally secret, mysterious, and unknowable; or that “he who enters the conclave a pope leaves it a cardinal.” Wrong! Game, set, and match. The truth is out there, and a journalist can sometimes get at it.)

Finally, I only recently discovered the New Advent Buzz Meter. Not a very sophisticated instrument, to be sure, but it offers some interesting insight into which cardinals are being discussed more than others. Note especially the change in rank over a week’s time: Some cardinals have risen a couple of points, some declined a couple — but Robert Cardinal Sarah has risen +26! I think this is a sign that people are interested in an African (Sarah is from Guinea) but may think that the supposed African frontrunner, the much-better-known Peter Cardinal Turkson, is flaming out because of various impolitic statements he has made, and the consequent loose-cannon impression the cardinals want to avoid. (There is precedent for the cardinals’ choosing a “junior senator” from a particular region: Remember that in 1978, Stefan Cardinal Wyszynski was the “famous” Polish cardinal, but the more obscure one, Wojtyla, was elected.) And it’s important to watch out for the cardinals who are more talked about closer to the election, as opposed to those who are on the earlier papabili lists. In 1978, Albino Cardinal Luciani was not on many of the initial lists, but I remember reading a newsmagazine article a few days before the election in which it was reported that the powerful Giovanni Cardinal Benelli was attracting attention by talking up Luciani. Whoever wins this time will almost certainly have been “floated” in this manner . . .


PS. Heh, heh. Courtesy of a Facebook friend: Sweet Sistine brackets! I must say, in my line of work I come across a lot of religious “satire” that shows its authors to be woefully ignorant of the subject they are trying to satirize; but these Sweet Sistine choices look like the work of people who have a pretty sophisticated understanding of what they’re talking about.

Most Popular


Fire Brenda Snipes

Brenda Snipes, the supervisor of elections in Florida’s Broward County, does not deserve to be within a thousand miles of any election office anywhere in these United States. She should be fired at the earliest possible opportunity. Snipes has held her position since 2003, in which year her predecessor, ... Read More
PC Culture

The Lonely Mob

Just before the election, an Andrew Gillum intern named Shelby Shoup was arrested and charged with battery after assaulting some college Republicans on the campus of Florida State University. It was rather less exciting than that sounds: She went on a rant about “Nazis” and “fascism” — Gillum’s ... Read More

How Immigration Changes Britain

Almost nothing is discussed as badly in America or Europe as the subject of immigration. And one reason is that it remains almost impossible to have any sensible or rational public discussion of its consequences. Or rather it is eminently possible to have a discussion about the upsides (“diversity,” talent, ... Read More

Sorry, Brian Kemp Still Won

Here was the state of play as of yesterday per the Kemp campaign’s breakdown of publicly available information: As of Saturday, November 10, 2018 (12:00 p.m.) *Information below is public.  Total votes reported: 3,924,658 Kemp: 1,975,162 (50.33%) Abrams: 1,912,383 (48.73%) Metz: ... Read More

The Georgia Smear

Back in 2016, when Trump refused to say he’d necessarily accept the result if he lost, we were told that this was a terrible violation of democratic norms. Now, refusing to accept that you lost an election is the highest form of patriotism. Not only are the media and the Left not pressuring Stacey Abrams to ... Read More