The Corner

Further Iraq Thoughts

Broadly speaking, I think we had a couple of options in Iraq after the invasion. The ambitious democratization route was option one:

de-Baathify, put the returnees in high places, take over the bureaucracy and train a new generation of Western educated, liberal-minded Iraqis to run the country. (Even here we should probably have held onto a chunk of the Iraqi army and/or helped find work for those soldiers we

dismissed.) Option two: a less ambitious policy of striking deals with a pro-American strongman (and/or strongmen) a few notches less repressive than Saddam, and keeping much of the army and the old bureaucracy in place.

In other words, either go for deep

democratization, or for quick deal-making with allies. The true democratization strategy would have required a lot of troops and a lot of time, although we may have been able to cut back on troops eventually if large sections of the

(non-disbanded) Iraqi army had truly switched allegiance to the new government.. Even the non-democratization strategy would have called for more American troops to establish security at the outset, but would have required large numbers of troops for a much shorter time than option one.

There were lots of interrelated mistakes here:

thinking we could get democratization on the cheap, and not fielding enough troops to support either of our key policy options. More deeply, we failed to recognize that a functioning national democracy depends upon deep-lying cultural and social pre-requisites that take time and effort to create. We treated the factions in Iraq as if they were Americanized ethnic groups sitting around a bargaining table–expecting that they’d recognize their own interest in peaceful democratic cooperation. We didn’t understand that democratic restraint and compromise depend upon a social structure and world-view (eg, loyalty to the nation, acceptance of the rule of law, belief in the principles of individual

liberty) that we take for granted, but that are in fact exceedingly difficult to export. And we mistakenly took the mere act of voting in elections as proof that this broader social transformation had already substantially advanced. We believed that all people everywhere have the desire for freedom in their hearts. In reality, it’s a whole lot more complicated than that.

Stanley Kurtz — Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Most Popular


Trump and the North Korean Tipping Point

The world has been stunned by North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un’s announcement last week that he was suspending his country’s nuclear tests in preparation for the impending meeting with President Trump. Even critics have had to concede that Trump’s bellicose rhetoric since last summer regarding the North ... Read More
Politics & Policy

E Pluribus . . . Gridlock

A mantra we hear everywhere these days is that diversity is a good thing. And no doubt, it is. Diversity facilitates an exchange of ideas and opinions, and it promotes economic growth. Moreover, the alternative to diversity is to suppress the views and opinions of some subset of citizens, which is completely ... Read More
Economy & Business

Trade Misunderstandings

I was distracted by other policy topics last week but not enough not to notice Peter Navarro’s article in the Wall Street Journal, headlined “China’s Faux Comparative Advantage.” Considering Navarro’s position in the White House, it is unfortunate that it demonstrates some serious misunderstandings ... Read More