The Corner

Gallup Found a Drop in Pro-Life Sentiment, but the Long-Term Gains Are Undeniable

Yesterday, Gallup released a survey on attitudes toward abortion that found a slight decrease in pro-life sentiment since their most recent poll in May 2013. Forty-six percent of respondents identified as “pro-life,” while 47 percent identified as “pro-choice.”

But the poll did contain some good news for pro-lifers: Gallup found that pro-lifers seem to care more about the issue when voting than pro-choicers – 24 percent of pro-lifers said that they would only vote for a candidate who shared their abortion views, while just 16 percent of people who identified as “pro-choice” said the same. This is consistent with surveys that show single-issue “pro-life” voters outnumbering single-issue “pro-choice” voters. In other words, contrary to media spin, taking a pro-life position should be politically advantageous.

But more important, much of the coverage of this poll will doubtless focus on the decline in pro-life sentiment, and ignore the long term progress that the pro-life position has made in the court of public opinion.

Gallup has been conducting survey research on abortion attitudes since the 1970s. Pro-life sentiment was as low as 33 percent as recently as 1995. But pro-life sentiment has increased consistently since that time. Gallup’s May 2009 poll was the first time where respondents were more likely to identify as “pro-life” rather than “pro-choice.” Six of the past ten Gallup polls have found respondents more likely to identify as “pro-life” rather than “pro-choice.” Overall, in other words, the pro-life position has made impressive progress in the court of public opinion, and one year’s survey shouldn’t be discouraging.

— Michael New is an assistant professor at the University of Michigan–Dearborn and an associate scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute. Follow him on Twitter @Michael_J_New.

Michael J. New is a visiting assistant professor of social research and political science at the Catholic University of America and an associate scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute in Washington, D.C.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Hillary Ruins the Plan

Editor’s note: Andrew C. McCarthy’s new book is Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency. This is the first in a series of excerpts.  There really was a collusion plot. It really did target our election system. It absolutely sought to usurp our capacity for ... Read More
Religion

Another Pop-Culture Christian Loses His Faith

It’s happened again. For the second time in three weeks, a prominent (at least in Evangelical circles) Christian has renounced his faith. In July, it was Josh Harris, a pastor and author of the mega-best-selling purity-culture book I Kissed Dating Goodbye. This month, it’s Hillsong United songwriter and ... Read More
Culture

Max Boot’s Dishonesty

Before yesterday, my primary criticism of the Washington Post’s Max Boot was political in nature. As I wrote in a recent book review, I found it regrettable that Boot’s opposition to the president had not prevented him from “succumbing reactively to Trump’s cult of personality, or from making Trump the ... Read More
Elections

A Brief History of Election Meddling

Editor’s note: Andrew C. McCarthy’s new book is Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency. This is the second in a series of excerpts. ‘The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back.” Thus spoke President Barack Obama just a couple of weeks before ... Read More
World

The End of Hong Kong as We Know It

The protests in Hong Kong have been going on for more than four months now, and no matter how the current crisis concludes in the coming days or weeks, it will mark the end of Hong Kong as we know it. The protests started in response to an extradition bill that was proposed by the city’s Beijing-backed ... Read More