The Corner


Game of Thrones Recap — Social Justice Edition

In response to Programming Notes…

Spoilers, of course.

Thank you, Stephen, for recapping the best episode this season of the best show on television. I’d summarize episode four as “Lucy finally lets Charlie Brown kick the football.” One of the more frustrating aspects of both the books and the show is the way in which George RR Martin lets you think there will be an actual Stark reunion — then yanks it away in often-bloody ways. It’s as if Lucy doesn’t just move the football as Charlie Brown kicks it, she decapitates him when he falls to the ground. I must confess that when Jon Snow embraced Sansa, the moment was almost worth the five-year wait. 

There are two joys to watching Game of Thrones, however — the joy of the show itself and the endless amusement of reading race and gender-saturated progressive recaps. It really does boil down the most absurdly reductionist analysis. It’s bad when a man rescues a woman. It’s good when a woman rescues a man. It’s bad when a man kills a woman. It’s good when a woman kills a man. It’s good when when slaves are rescued. It’s bad when white people rescue the slaves. I get the feeling that if the show creators invented a race of dark-skinned, genocidal Amazon women, had them invade the seven kingdoms, and kill every single living male, the entire progressive internet might just melt down with joy. 

In the meantime, we have to content ourselves with paragraphs like this, from The Atlantic’s weekly recap series:

Certainly, Danaerys’s final moment of triumph—having all of Vaes Dothrak fall to their knees before her (Mulan-style!)—echoes the uncomfortable white-savior undertones of season three’s “Mhysa.” But my optimistic reading of this scene is that it’s an affirmation of the way many of Game of Thrones’s female characters (Sansa, Brienne, Yara) have managed to remain more than whole in a world that still skews toward viewing them as objects. You could see Sansa and Danaerys’s utter coolness in the face of rape threats as the ultimate declaration of their superhuman spirit—a potentially fraught way of framing the experiences of those who have been sexually assaulted, as Parul Sehgal explained in The New York Times. And yet, I’ll be the first to say that I’m just happy for the perpetual victimhood of Sansa Stark to be over. Yes, we’ll have to sit through still more gang-rape threats and the humiliation and deaths of characters like Osha—such unnecessary horrors are baked into Game of Thrones’s DNA by now. But “Book of the Stranger” went a long way toward amending some of the cruel (often gendered) injustices of the past without erasing them entirely; that alone made it the standout hour of the season.

A friend of mine suggested that I should live-tweet the next episode of the show from the standpoint of an SJW — a “Social Justice Westerosi” — but it’s too easy to be fun. In the meantime I’ll just go on liking and disliking Thrones characters based on their actions and virtues. I like Danaerys not because she’s a woman but because she’s so compelling that I think Khaleesi could Make America Great Again. As for Cersei Lannister and Ramsay Bolton, my loathing is gender-blind. 

Let me close with my favorite-ever strained social justice take on Game of Thrones, courtesy of Vox.

Social justice warriors, don’t you ever change.

David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Fox News Anchor Shepard Smith Resigns

Fox News Channel's chief anchor, Shepard Smith, announced on air Friday that he would be resigning from his post after 23 years with the network. “This is my last newscast here,” said Smith. “Recently, I asked the company to allow me to leave Fox News. After requesting that I stay, they obliged.” He ... Read More
NR Webathon

Don’t Let Michael Mann Succeed

I  enjoyed the running joke of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce in the great Dickens novel Bleak House, back when I first read it. Little did I know that one day I and the magazine that I love would effectively be caught up in a version of that interminable case, courtesy of a litigious climate scientist with zero regard ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More

Beto Proposes to Oppress Church with State

Beto O’Rourke’s presidential campaign is within the margin of error of non-existence, but in his failure he has found a purpose: expressing the Democratic id. His latest bid for left-wing love came at a CNN forum on gay rights, where he said that churches that oppose same-sex marriage should have to pay ... Read More