The Corner

Law & the Courts

Big Labor Expects to Lose This Time

Two years ago, the Supreme Court heard the Friedrichs case, which tests the constitutionality of compulsory dues or fees for public employees. Everyone thought the Court would rule in favor of the plaintiff — until Justice Scalia’s death. The Court split 4-4 afterwards, keeping the status quo of mandatory payments going.

A new case presenting the same issue is on the Court’s docket now — Janus v. AFSCME.

With Justice Gorsuch on the Court, it seems likely that the unions will lose. If so, millions of public employees would be free to decide for themselves if they want to pay anything for their union representation. A great chunk of the money that unions like AFSCME collect goes into leftist politics and causes. A win for Mr. Janus would puncture that big money pipeline.

I write about the case in this Forbes article.

Apparently, the unions anticipate a loss and are preparing for it by trying to dragoon workers into contracts that would make it very hard for them to exercise their rights. In Minnesota, the teachers’ union is hoping that members won’t read the fine print on an innocuous looking card. If they sign it, teachers will thereafter find it very hard to escape from paying dues or fees.

The plain truth is that public unions have always been a conspiracy with the Democratic party against the taxpayers. The sane approach is the one that North Carolina has held to — no public sector bargaining at all.

George Leef is the the director of editorial content at the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal.

Most Popular


The Democrats’ Disastrous CNN LGBT Town Hall

A few days after Donald Trump committed the worst foreign-policy blunder of his presidency by betraying America’s Kurdish allies in northern Syria, former vice president Joe Biden, the elder statesman and co-frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary, was on a national stage talking to CNN’s primetime ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Fox News Anchor Shepard Smith Resigns

Fox News Channel's chief anchor, Shepard Smith, announced on air Friday that he would be resigning from his post after 23 years with the network. “This is my last newscast here,” said Smith. “Recently, I asked the company to allow me to leave Fox News. After requesting that I stay, they obliged.” He ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More
NR Webathon

Don’t Let Michael Mann Succeed

I  enjoyed the running joke of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce in the great Dickens novel Bleak House, back when I first read it. Little did I know that one day I and the magazine that I love would effectively be caught up in a version of that interminable case, courtesy of a litigious climate scientist with zero regard ... Read More

Beto Proposes to Oppress Church with State

Beto O’Rourke’s presidential campaign is within the margin of error of non-existence, but in his failure he has found a purpose: expressing the Democratic id. His latest bid for left-wing love came at a CNN forum on gay rights, where he said that churches that oppose same-sex marriage should have to pay ... Read More