The Corner

Goldman Sachs Wants More of Your Money

Speaking of crony capitalists in bed with the administration, Goldman Sachs continues to clarify the “Too Big To Fail” issue I wrote about yesterday. Witness its release of a “study” today:

A $61.5 billion spending-cut bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on Saturday would slow economic growth significantly this year, according to an analysis by the global investment firm Goldman Sachs.

“Under the House passed spending bill, the drag on GDP growth from federal fiscal policy would increase by 1.5pp (percentage points) to 2pp in Q2 and Q3 compared with current law,” according to Alec Phillips, who signed the analysis that is dated Tuesday.

Democrats, who want to maintain spending this year at around current levels, seized on the Goldman Sachs analysis.

“This nonpartisan study proves that the House Republicans’ proposal is a recipe for a double-dip recession,” said Senator Charles Schumer, a member of the Senate’s Democratic leadership.

Republicans in Congress, especially conservative Tea Party activists who were elected in November, have touted their fiscal 2011 spending-cut bill and upcoming attempts to impose more U.S. budget cuts as the key to improving the economy and creating jobs.

Goldman Sachs is one of President Obama’s strongest backers, second perhaps only to JPMorgan Chase. If Republicans find “government-subsidized malefactors of great wealth” too strong, they might try bashing “Wall Street Welfare Queens.” Oh, and buy a copy of Charlie Gasparino’s Bought and Paid For to see how the sausage was made.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Making Sense of the Iran Chaos

One would prefer that correct decisions be made according to careful, deliberate plan. But a correct decision made impulsively, through a troubling process, is still nonetheless correct, and so it is with Donald Trump’s decision to refrain from military action against Iran. The proposed strike would represent a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More