The Corner

Politics & Policy

How to End Government Shutdowns

Government shutdowns are becoming routine, and it’s easy to imagine we’ll see another one in the days to come. Though congressional leaders have been inching towards an agreement that would have allowed discretionary spending to bust through federal spending caps, President Trump has now declared that if he doesn’t get his way on the construction of a border wall, he’d welcome a shutdown. It’s always hard to know how seriously to take the president’s pronouncements. His apparent eagerness for a shutdown might be little more than bluster. Then again, the resolution of the last shutdown was widely interpreted as a humiliating climbdown for the Democratic leadership in Congress, and the president could be itching for a repeat. But last time around, Republicans had yet to make a concession on funding CHIP, which gave them additional leverage. To keep the government open, the GOP leadership agreed to fund CHIP for several more years, taking the issue off the table. That could, at least in theory, strengthen the hands of congressional Democrats, at least some of whom might relish the thought of another confrontation with a not terribly popular president. Whether or not another shutdown is imminent, the mechanics of partisan enmity ensure that we’ll see many more of them, with all the disruption they entail.

Unless, that is, we put an end to shutdowns outright by passing a version of Ohio senator Rob Portman’s appealingly literal “End Government Shutdowns Act.” Brian Riedl, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, and a former Portman staffer, writes in favor of the proposal over at Economics 21. And he makes a compelling case. Essentially, the bill puts an end to shutdowns by establishing that if Congress does not pass a budget in a timely fashion, a continuing resolution that funds all government programs under the levels previously established would take hold by default.

So why wouldn’t a dysfunctional Congress just keep kicking the can down the road? Portman’s bill builds in a poison pill: Funding levels would be cut by 1 percent every three months until a proper budget is passed. Riedl acknowledges the possibility that small-government Republicans might take such automatic cuts in stride, giving Democrats a reason to balk. But then why not propose to get rid of the poison pill? It’s a good question. Indeed, Portman and his like-minded allies might consider moving to get rid of it preemptively. And President Trump would do well to cheer them on. Eager though he might be to win this shutdown fight, the truth is that, in the long run, no one wins a shutdown fight.

Update: It looks like we have a deal.

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular


Trump’s Disgraceful Press Conference in Helsinki

On Monday, President Trump gave a deeply disgraceful press conference with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. The presser began with Trump announcing that although the Russia–U.S. relationship has “never been worse than it is now,” all of that “changed as of about four hours ago.” It was downhill from ... Read More

Questions for Al Franken

1)Al, as you were posting on social media a list of proposed questions for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, did it occur to you that your opinion on the matter is no more relevant than Harvey Weinstein’s? 2) Al, is it appropriate for a disgraced former U.S. senator to use the Twitter cognomen “U.S. ... Read More
White House

The President’s Do-Over

I agree with Jonah on all counts: On net, President Trump’s do-over of his Helsinki remarks is a good thing; regrettably, it is not sincere; and while I hope the revised version is the one he sticks to, I don’t have confidence that will be the case -- as posited in my column Tuesday on the folly of having the ... Read More
National Security & Defense

Trump’s Helsinki Discord

Donald Trump is not, and never will be, the Moscow correspondent for The Nation magazine, and he shouldn’t sound like it. The left-wing publication is prone to extend sympathetic understanding to adversaries of the United States and find some reason, any reason, to blame ourselves for their external ... Read More