The Corner

Greek Government: Not As Austere As It Claimed

Last week, I mentioned a rumor that the Greek government didn’t actually cut spending and lay off public employees at the level that it had committed to in order to meet the bailout requirements. Now, it is official. According to Reuters:

Greece conceded on Thursday it had slipped “in some respects” in implementing the cuts and reforms demanded by lenders in exchange for saving Athens from bankruptcy, and tried to persuade them to cut the country some slack.

Finance Minister Yannis Stournaras made the admission after meeting senior officials from Greece’s “troika” of lenders from the EU, European Central Bank and International Monetary Fund, whose inspectors have begun picking through the country’s books after weeks of political paralysis.

According to the report, in 2010 and 2011, rather than cutting spending as the Greek government had promised, it actually hired as many as 70,000 public employees. Now that they are exposed, the government officials are trying — it seems — to sell the deception as a good thing and as consistent with the European focus (driven by the French president) on growth. Growth, in theory, is supposed to materialize through government spending and the employment of bureaucrats.

I had mentioned my doubts about Greece’s actual commitment to cutting government spending after reading reports that the country’s “parliament kept full pay, full benefits, its fleet of BMWs, and a full staff. Greece maintained its sweetheart subsidies for businesses, banks, the army and those who choose not to work. Its sizeable delegations and facilities in Brussels, Vienna, Geneva and Washington are still large, as are the life-time pensions for politicians.”

The whole thing is here.

Veronique de Rugy — Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

Most Popular

PC Culture

The New, New Anti-Semitism

The old anti-Semitism was mostly, but not exclusively, a tribal prejudice expressed in America up until the mid 20th century most intensely on the right. It manifested itself from the silk-stocking country club and corporation (“gentlemen’s agreement”) to the rawer regions of the Ku Klux Klan’s lunatic ... Read More

The Left, the Wall, the Truth

Democrats and others on the left offer three reasons for their opposition to building a wall on America's southern border. 1. A wall is ineffective. 2. A wall is too expensive. 3. A wall is immoral. Each one is false, so false as to constitute lies. So, the only question is: Do Democrats and others on ... Read More