The Corner

Politics & Policy

Guns and Majorities

A trio of liberal pundit/scholars argues that majorities support various forms of gun control and do not get their way because of our political system’s increasingly pronounced anti-democratic features.

I’m not sure they’re right about public opinion. They cite a poll that shows a 54 percent majority in favor of a ban on assault weapons. Gallup has found majority opposition, and the Wall Street Journal/NBC poll has found plurality opposition. I grant, though, that other gun regulations that consistently have majority support in the polls don’t get anywhere.

But they overlook one reason for that pattern that has nothing to do with redistricting, the filibuster, or the overrepresentation of rural states in the Senate: the intensity of voter sentiment. It seems to me obvious that there are a lot more people who will vote against a politician than will vote for him on the basis of his support for gun regulations, and politicians know it.

One reason for the asymmetric intensity on the issue is that some supporters of gun regulation don’t think it would do much good. Quinnipiac last year found 59 percent support for banning assault weapons, but only 47 percent thought it would do much to reduce gun violence (49 percent didn’t think it would). A CBS/New York Times poll found that 26 percent of the public thought “stricter gun control” would “help a lot” to prevent gun violence. Public ambivalence on guns shows up in other ways: An NBC/WSJ poll taken in the last few weeks found that 50 percent of people worry that the government will go too far in restricting gun rights, while 45 percent worry it won’t go far enough.

In 2013, when Congress last voted on assault weapons, Colorado had two Democratic senators. From the Census statistics, it’s not an especially rural state. Both senators voted against the proposal.

As long as democracy is representative rather than plebiscitary, the side of a debate that is more intense in its conviction is going to have an advantage.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular


An Idea for Student Loans: Get Rid of Them

Here is a three-part plan for something practical the federal government could do to relieve college-loan debt. Step 1: The federal government should stop making college loans itself and cease guaranteeing any such loans. Step 2: It should prohibit educational lending by federally regulated financial institutions ... Read More
White House

The Problem with the Mueller Report

So much for collusion. The media conversation has now officially moved on from the obsession of the last two years to obstruction of justice. That’s because the first volume of the voluminous Mueller report, the half devoted to what was supposed to be the underlying crime of a Trump conspiracy with Russia, ... Read More
White House


Some of you will be familiar with a lefty, partisan Democratic organization called MoveOn, formerly MoveOn.Org. It was founded during an investigation into President Bill Clinton’s shenanigans (which were not, Democratic mythology notwithstanding, strictly sexual in nature) and argued that it was time for the ... Read More

Screw York Yankees

You are dead to me. You are a collection of Fredos. The cock has crowed, you pathetic sniveling jerks. The team I have rooted for since 1965, when I first visited the House that Ruth Built, where I hawked peanuts and ice cream a lifetime ago, watched countless games (Guidry striking out 18!), has gotten so ... Read More