The Corner

With Hagel ‘Not Up to the Job,’ a Look Back at His Many Misguided Supporters

By claiming that “retiring” defense secretary Chuck Hagel “wasn’t up to the the job,” White House officials are finally echoing criticisms from Republican lawmakers during Hagel’s 2013 confirmation hearing. Talking heads from across the political spectrum are now nodding in agreement, noting that Hagel’s inexperience and policy differences with the administration make his departure unsurprising.

But many were singing a different tune during Hagel’s confirmation period, shortly after President Obama’s reelection. At the time, the Nebraska senator’s defenders came out of the woodwork to slam the campaign against him, which largely centered around Hagel’s lack of Pentagon know-how and supposed hostility towards Israel.

Media types were among Hagel’s most vociferous defenders. “I’m kinda glad [William] Kristol is championing the anti-Hagel fight,” tweeted Eric Boehlert, a writer at Media Matters for America, in January 2013. ”It reminds everyone how he and necons got EVERYTHING WRONG about Iraq War.” MSNBC’s Chris Hayes tore into Republicans for their “demagoguery and bullying” during Hagel’s February confirmation hearing.

Then-Guardian reporter Glenn Greenwald called criticism of Hagel part of a “smear campaign” headed by the pro-Israel lobby. “Hagel is one of the very, very few prominent national politicians from either party who has been brave enough to question and dissent from the destructive bipartisan orthodoxies on foreign policy,” Greenwald wrote. “If this nomination actually happens, this will be one of Obama’s best appointments and boldest steps of his presidency.”

Democratic lawmakers and former officials also lent Hagel their unqualified support. Hagel, insisted former Carter adviser Zbigniew Brezezinski, “would infuse into our foreign policy what is very much needed . . . strategic significance — that is to say, a preoccupation with the problems that we’re slowly, collectively sliding into.” Former secretary of state Colin Powell called Hagel “superbly qualified,” claiming he’d do a “great job as secretary of defense.”

Rhode Island senator Jack Reed — now rumored to be on the defense secretary short list — said Hagel ”has a successful business record. He is an entrepreneur who’s succeeded. He’s also good in terms of recognizing the need to delegate. . . . You have to listen as well as talk and you have to be decisive, and he’s certainly decisive. So, he has many intellectual and temperamental qualities that would make him a great secretary of defense.”

Former defense secretary Leon Panetta, whom Hagel replaced, called the senator “smart and capable.” Democratic New Mexico senator Tom Udall said Hagel possessed “a demonstrated understanding for the nuances of foreign policy and national security.” And Illinois senator Dick Durbin praised Hagel, saying he “can understand why President Obama has chosen him . . . I certainly come to his nomination with a positive feeling, that the president has chosen an excellent person to lead that department.”

The Senate voted 58–41 to confirm Hagel in February 2013, with just four Republicans joining all 53 Democrats in backing the Nebraska senator for secretary of defense.

Most Popular

Media

About That ‘Uncoverable’ Biden Story

Journalists claim they can’t cover the New York Post’s Hunter Biden email scoop because the underlying evidence has yet to been verified. Also, they won’t look for any verifying evidence because there isn’t enough evidence. It’s quite the conundrum. Because other than the now-corroborated emails, ... Read More
Media

About That ‘Uncoverable’ Biden Story

Journalists claim they can’t cover the New York Post’s Hunter Biden email scoop because the underlying evidence has yet to been verified. Also, they won’t look for any verifying evidence because there isn’t enough evidence. It’s quite the conundrum. Because other than the now-corroborated emails, ... Read More
Media

‘Anonymous’ Falls Flat

On the menu today: The op-ed page of the New York Times made the deliberate decision to hoodwink America about the identity of “Anonymous”; the sense of guilt that pervades legacy media -- a very apt label; and wondering whether or not we will even see long lines on Election Day with early voting being so ... Read More
Media

‘Anonymous’ Falls Flat

On the menu today: The op-ed page of the New York Times made the deliberate decision to hoodwink America about the identity of “Anonymous”; the sense of guilt that pervades legacy media -- a very apt label; and wondering whether or not we will even see long lines on Election Day with early voting being so ... Read More
White House

Hell, Yes

Editor’s Note: If you would like to read more pros and cons on voting for President Trump, further essays on the subject, each from a different perspective, can be found here, here, here, here, and here. These articles, and the one below, reflect the views of the individual authors, not of the National ... Read More
White House

Hell, Yes

Editor’s Note: If you would like to read more pros and cons on voting for President Trump, further essays on the subject, each from a different perspective, can be found here, here, here, here, and here. These articles, and the one below, reflect the views of the individual authors, not of the National ... Read More

Another Pollster Sees a Trump Win

The Trafalgar Group’s Robert Cahaly is an outlier among pollsters in that he thinks President Trump will carry Michigan, Pennsylvania, or both, and hence be reelected with roughly 280 electoral votes. (I explained his thinking here.) Last week another pollster, Jim Lee of Susquehanna Polling and Research, ... Read More

Another Pollster Sees a Trump Win

The Trafalgar Group’s Robert Cahaly is an outlier among pollsters in that he thinks President Trump will carry Michigan, Pennsylvania, or both, and hence be reelected with roughly 280 electoral votes. (I explained his thinking here.) Last week another pollster, Jim Lee of Susquehanna Polling and Research, ... Read More