The Corner

Hamilton & Subtleties

Peter, don’t give up the ship. Alexander Hamilton was a lawyer, who argued before New York City juries. What is he going to say in the Federalist, a polemic addressed to the New York City public? Yup, juries are pretty stupid, the law is way over their heads.

To follow Hamilton through a great case, like Rutgers v. Waddington or The People v. Croswell, is to watch a performance at a very high level, like riding on Blondin’s back when he walked over Niagara Falls on a tightrope.

Hamilton was a democratic elitist. He made his ideas available to everyone, and hoped he could persuade everyone. But he was an elitist–he never pulled punches, or pretended you wouldn’t have to buckle down.

Richard Brookhiser — Historian Richard Brookhiser is a senior editor of National Review and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

White House

Mueller’s Got Nothing

The revelations of the last few days are, though disguised, the crash in ignominy of the Robert Mueller putsch. But they are far from the end of the story. While the sire of the Mueller hit-squad assault, former FBI director James Comey, declared 245 times at last Friday’s House Judiciary Committee hearing that ... Read More

The Dangers of Asymmetry

It is strange how suddenly a skeptical Wall Street, CEOs, and even university and think-tank policy analysts are now jumping on the once-taboo Trump bandwagon on China: that if something is not done to stop China’s planned trajectory to global hegemony, based on its repudiation of the entire post-war trade and ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Donald Trump and the Imperial Presidency

As the writer of a weekly political column in the Age of Trump (ugh), I have lately been wondering if, bereft of an idea, I might just write TRUMP over and over again, 750 times, and get people to read it. An idle thought — perhaps. After all, this was the week when my Twitter timeline was full of mainstream ... Read More