The Corner

Happy October Surprise: Iran Endorses Obama

It’s from Iran again, an October move that could throw the election, and this time it’s for real. Iran is near to agreeing to hold direct nuclear talks with the U.S. It throws a big bone to Obama, on the eve of his final foreign-policy debate with Romney.

Plainly, it does not want to face a Romney presidency.

It’s not something dreamed up after the fact, as in the 1980s “October Surprise.” This time around, the story comes from the parties that stand to benefit from it, and it’s out there in real time — indeed, with exquisite campaign timing.

Administration officials anonymously leaked it just in the nick of time to affect the final debate. They couldn’t afford to wait for Iran to complete the agreement on talking with us.

The old “October Surprise” was a conspiracy theory meant to delegitimize an election in which the impermissible happened: A conservative Republican won. That Republican was so dangerous that the mass media subjected him to almost endless demonization. He was an ignorant, low-grade, B-movie actor, itching to start a nuclear war and bring on the Apocalypse. He was, of course, Ronald Reagan.

Today’s October Surprise does not mean that Iran is agreeing to any substantive results. It is agreeing (possibly) only to play along with a long-standing suggestion for two-party talks. The talks would take months to play out before we’d learn whether Iran has any good faith about reaching a substantive agreement through such discussion. Read that to mean: It will be months before we learn, in all probability, that the talks were only another stalling tactic, a maneuver to buy time for further developing Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

Meanwhile, news of impending talks creates an ambiguity that could blunt the force of one of Romney’s arguments in the foreign-policy debate — the argument that Obama’s policy of outreach to Iran has failed and merely given Iran time to make matters worse. And damaging Romney’s foreign-policy credibility is the one verifiable purpose of this move.

Iran is giving its vote to Obama in the election.

Most Popular

World

On Trade, No One Is Waiting for Washington

President Donald Trump’s flips and flops on trade are now as ubiquitous as his 5:00 a.m. tweets. Many predicted that trade-expansion efforts would come to a standstill and world commerce would suffer amidst all the uncertainty. Instead, the precise opposite has happened. In the last few months, it’s become ... Read More
National Security & Defense

Trump’s Syria Quandary

President Trump raised eyebrows recently when he ended a tweet lauding the airstrikes he’d ordered against chemical-weapons facilities in Syria with the words “mission accomplished.” The phrase, of course, became infamous in the aftermath of the invasion of Iraq, when President Bush used it in a speech ... Read More
U.S.

Confirm Pompeo

What on earth are the Democrats doing? President Trump has nominated CIA director Mike Pompeo, eminently qualified by any reasonable standard, to be America’s 70th secretary of state. And yet the Senate Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer, have perverted the advice and consent clause of the Constitution into a ... Read More
PC Culture

People Are Losing Their Minds Over Starbucks

We can all easily imagine circumstances in which a manager of a coffee shop or restaurant might properly call the police to ask them to remove loiterers. These are places of business. There’s nothing wrong in principle with calling the cops on non-customers who are taking up space. And there’s nothing wrong ... Read More
PC Culture

The Dark Side of the Starbucks Stand-Down

By now the story is all over America. Earlier this month, two black men entered a Starbucks store in Philadelphia. They were apparently waiting for a friend before ordering — the kind of thing people do every day — and one of the men asked to use the restroom. A Starbucks employee refused, saying the restroom ... Read More