The Corner

Hardly My First

From a reader:

Hello,

I’m a big fan. This is your first really MAJOR blooper I’ve noticed:

“2. The failure to find WMDs is the material evidence (or lack thereof)

necessary to make this the worst intelligence blunder since Pearl Harbor.”

You should really read more about the history of WMD intelligence against

totalitarian regimes. It’s ALWAYS BEEN WRONG. There’s nothing new about

this. (And isn’t 9/11 a worse intellligence failure? But I digress.)

1. Against Stalin, the CIA estimate was off by five years — too late.

2. In India and Pakistan, the CIA not only underestimated their

capabilities, but also totally overlooked actual Indian preparations to

explode their first bomb.

3. In North Korea, Clinton’s CIA consistently underestimated their readiness

to go nuclear;

4. The CIA was apparently unaware of the AQ Khan network which spread nuke

technology to North Korea and Iran. (Khan worked for a Dutch nuclear

research institute and apparently just walked off with blueprints for

centrigures). The Dutch are apparently as idiotic on weapons security as we

are in Los Alamos.

We know it’s nearly impossible to uncover top secrets in totalitarian

countries. For that reason I’m surprised that YOU are surprised that we

were wrong about Saddam’s WMDs. You might recall that Saddam’s own frontline

officers expected OTHER units to have WMDs. It was always the next unit that

was supposed to have them. Saddam either lied to his troops, or his WMD

scientists lied to him, or both. Just like the Soviet Union, remember?

Recommended

The Dossier Deceit

The Dossier Deceit

John Durham’s latest indictment reinforces that the Russian collusion conspiracy was built on a preposterous foundation.

The Latest