The Corner

Hardly My First

From a reader:

Hello,

I’m a big fan. This is your first really MAJOR blooper I’ve noticed:

“2. The failure to find WMDs is the material evidence (or lack thereof)

necessary to make this the worst intelligence blunder since Pearl Harbor.”

You should really read more about the history of WMD intelligence against

totalitarian regimes. It’s ALWAYS BEEN WRONG. There’s nothing new about

this. (And isn’t 9/11 a worse intellligence failure? But I digress.)

1. Against Stalin, the CIA estimate was off by five years — too late.

2. In India and Pakistan, the CIA not only underestimated their

capabilities, but also totally overlooked actual Indian preparations to

explode their first bomb.

3. In North Korea, Clinton’s CIA consistently underestimated their readiness

to go nuclear;

4. The CIA was apparently unaware of the AQ Khan network which spread nuke

technology to North Korea and Iran. (Khan worked for a Dutch nuclear

research institute and apparently just walked off with blueprints for

centrigures). The Dutch are apparently as idiotic on weapons security as we

are in Los Alamos.

We know it’s nearly impossible to uncover top secrets in totalitarian

countries. For that reason I’m surprised that YOU are surprised that we

were wrong about Saddam’s WMDs. You might recall that Saddam’s own frontline

officers expected OTHER units to have WMDs. It was always the next unit that

was supposed to have them. Saddam either lied to his troops, or his WMD

scientists lied to him, or both. Just like the Soviet Union, remember?

Most Popular

Why Not Make Democrats Angry?

Some of the Right’s leading thinkers, people I hold in the highest esteem, say circumstances are so unusual right now that the president and the Senate should do something other than what they ordinarily would do when a Supreme Court vacancy occurs: nominate and consider a replacement for Justice Ruth Bader ... Read More

Why Not Make Democrats Angry?

Some of the Right’s leading thinkers, people I hold in the highest esteem, say circumstances are so unusual right now that the president and the Senate should do something other than what they ordinarily would do when a Supreme Court vacancy occurs: nominate and consider a replacement for Justice Ruth Bader ... Read More
U.S.

Systemic Racism? Make Them Prove It.

I  worked in the criminal-justice system for a quarter century. It is run, day-to-day, by the crème de la crème of graduates from America’s top law schools. Those institutions wear their progressive bona fides on their sleeves and proclaim it for all the world to hear. In their offhand rhetoric — ... Read More
U.S.

Systemic Racism? Make Them Prove It.

I  worked in the criminal-justice system for a quarter century. It is run, day-to-day, by the crème de la crème of graduates from America’s top law schools. Those institutions wear their progressive bona fides on their sleeves and proclaim it for all the world to hear. In their offhand rhetoric — ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Get Your Facts Right

On the menu today: Another reminder that “People of Praise” and “People of Hope” are not the same group, and proof that “People of Hope” did not inspire Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale; wondering what Joe Biden is doing with his time these days; and two Senate committees release their ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Get Your Facts Right

On the menu today: Another reminder that “People of Praise” and “People of Hope” are not the same group, and proof that “People of Hope” did not inspire Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale; wondering what Joe Biden is doing with his time these days; and two Senate committees release their ... Read More