The Corner

Have We Not Learnt Anything about Toxic Assets?

Apparently not. Over at Neighborhood Effects, Eileen Norcross explains how New Jersey’s pension fund is considering buying troubled loans and securities, or “toxic assets” because it believes that they could provide a good return on investment.

Never mind, she writes, that:

New Jersey’s pension has been in crisis for a while, in part because the market has fallen, and in part because of fiscal manipulation and abuse.

The state has bonded to pay for it, deferred contributions for several years and played with the valuation rules to get the books to balance — all while expanding benefits. Grantees have also exploited the system, using gimmicks to increase the size of their pensions such as tacking on multiple jobs, boosting base salaries, and getting benefits for part-time work.

According to, “[…] Governor Corzine believes the program could provide a lucrative opportunity for New Jersey’s pension fund.” Sure. As we’ve seen in the last six months, toxic assets really make for great investments.

Read the whole post here.

Veronique de Rugy — Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

Most Popular

PC Culture

The New, New Anti-Semitism

The old anti-Semitism was mostly, but not exclusively, a tribal prejudice expressed in America up until the mid 20th century most intensely on the right. It manifested itself from the silk-stocking country club and corporation (“gentlemen’s agreement”) to the rawer regions of the Ku Klux Klan’s lunatic ... Read More

The Left, the Wall, the Truth

Democrats and others on the left offer three reasons for their opposition to building a wall on America's southern border. 1. A wall is ineffective. 2. A wall is too expensive. 3. A wall is immoral. Each one is false, so false as to constitute lies. So, the only question is: Do Democrats and others on ... Read More