The Corner

HBO’s Reagan

I watched most of HBO’s documentary on Reagan yesterday, and came away wondering why everyone cares so much about him. The chief aim of the piece, by its own characterization, was to demystify the former president. After watching it, I take that as documentarian-eze for “take down a notch or two.” 

The good: The film features our own Peter Robinson (though not nearly enough, by my measure — a few sound bites from a long and substantive interview). And the story of Reagan’s pre-presidential years is charming and engaging. 

But once focused on his years in office, the film offers little of substance to explain why Reagan is so revered. Instead, deficit spending, the AIDS epidemic, and Iran Contra got much of the attention The Hinckley assassination attempt is offered as an explanation for Reagan’s legislative success in lowering taxes. No doubt it played a role, but was it really that simple? Arthur Laffer is permitted to defend “Reaganomics,” but the film presents it as nothing more than “trickle-down” economics (or “Something-d-o-o economics,” as Ben Stein put it in another context). The film says little of the turnaround of the American economy from Carter’s “malaise” years, reined-in inflation and lowered interest rates, or any of the other significant domestic accomplishments of Reagan’s tenure. 

Peter is interviewed briefly about the famous “tear down this wall” speech, but I doubt much of what he said of the impact and importance of that speech was included in the film.  (Peter shares a brief amusing anecdote about how he had originally proposed a different formulation of that famous line, only to be told that it is best not to have the President proclaiming in a foreign tongue).   The film declines to credit Reagan with the later fall of the Berlin Wall, describing the truth as more “complicated.” 

So rather than demystifying President Reagan, the film comes off as a trite, myopic presentation of his presidency. If viewed by someone who knew nothing independently of Reagan, it would raise the question of why anyone would care. Various mainstream reviews I have read suggest that only the most ardent Reaganites would fail to see the film’s balanced presentation. I guess that makes me an ardent Reaganite.  

I would be curious to know whether others watched and whether I’m simply being too hypersensitive about it all.

Most Popular


Ezra Klein’s Intellectual Demagoguery

Ezra Klein wants you to know that he doesn’t think Sam Harris is a racist. “I’m not here to say you’re racist, I don’t think you are,” Klein explains in a two-hour debate with Harris on the latter’s podcast, Waking Up. “We have not called you one.” No, not at all. Klein is telling the truth ... Read More

The Scholarship/Activism Balance — A Rejoinder

The Martin Center recently published an article by sociology professor Fabio Rojas, in which he argued that professors should maintain the right balance between their teaching and scholarship on the one hand, and activism on the other. In today's article, the Center's Jay Schalin pushes back somewhat. Schalin ... Read More

The Book Comey Wanted to Write

Making the click-through worthwhile: the book James Comey had wanted to write, Facebook starts to feel useless to some writers, an infamous D.C. city councilman manages to make everything worse, and Hillary Clinton’s campaign finds its wish granted. What Did James Comey’s First Draft of A Higher ... Read More
Film & TV

Pro-Life Feminist

My paisana at the Human Life Review are hosting an event in NYC on Thursday, May 3, at the Sheen Center (18 Bleeker Street) for the airing of director Jim Hanon’s half-hour documentary, Pro-Life Feminist. After the viewing, he’ll join the trio of castmates -- Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa, Aimee Murphy, and ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Good News for Pompeo

Looks like he's in, as he should be. But this fight has been a hint of what life will be like for Trump if the Democrats somehow take the Senate -- they'd refuse to confirm anyone for anything. Read More