The Corner

Politics & Policy

Hillary Clinton’s Pro-Abortion Nightmare

Hillary Clinton has called for ending the Hyde Amendment that prevents federal money from being used to fund abortions on Medicaid. From the Breitbart News story quoting a Clinton speech that aired C-Span. Sayeth Clinton (my emphasis):

I believe we need to protect access to safe and legal abortion, not just in principle, but in practice.

Any right that requires you to take measures to access it, is no right at all.

Not when patients and providers have to endure harassment and intimidation just to walk into a health center; not when making an appointment means taking time off from work, finding child care, and driving half-way across your state; not when providers are required by state law to recite misleading information to women in order to shame and scare them; and not as long as we have laws on the books like the Hyde Amendment, making it harder for low-income women to exercise their full rights.

Notice that Clinton has dumped the “rare” in the, “safe, legal, and rare” obfuscation phrase deployed by her husband’s administration.

Notice also that Clinton seeks to end a form of comity that keeps abortion legal but doesn’t force dissenting taxpayers to fund it.

Notice too that she appears to want women to receive paid time off from work to kill their fetus.

Clinton would establish abortion as a “positive right,” meaning access would be guaranteed to all women by the government–even if it requires coercion of the private sector, perhaps including doctors.

What’s going on? As I have written here and elsewhere, the idea of “pro-choice” is being eschewed as a pro-abortion movement is emerging.

What might be the difference between a pro-choice and pro-abortion movement?

  • Pro-abortion activists want abortion available, free for every woman at any time.
  • Pro-abortion activists want to stifle dissenting views–California now requires crisis pregnancy centers to advertise for abortion clinics.
  • Pro-abortion activists want terminations available basically through the ninth month.

That would require overturning Roe v Wade, which explicitly allows some state regulation, allowing pro-lifers to crack and chip the abortion behemoth for decades, with more cases before the Supreme Court this term. (Roe was intended to end the abortion debate but failed in that quest.)

If Clinton is elected POTUS, she will appoint Supreme Court justices who agree with Ruth Bader Ginsberg, that the proper protection of abortion isn’t so much privacy, but equal protection.

Such a ruling would make the right to abortion absolute. I believe there are already 4 votes on SCOTUS for such a ruling.

Read what Clinton said again carefully. She is calling for a constitutional guarantee to unfettered abortion, at any time for any reason, no meaningful dissent or legal resistance allowed.

If that happens, it will really tear the country apart.

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Making Sense of the Iran Chaos

One would prefer that correct decisions be made according to careful, deliberate plan. But a correct decision made impulsively, through a troubling process, is still nonetheless correct, and so it is with Donald Trump’s decision to refrain from military action against Iran. The proposed strike would represent a ... Read More