The Corner

Hillary: I’m Here, Get Used To It

I have a new story on Hillary Clinton’s landslide win in West Virginia.   Among other things, I look back at the 1992 race, in which Jerry Brown stayed in through early June even though he was more than 1,500 delegates behind Bill Clinton:

Brown could stay in as long as he liked because his presence didn’t really matter. But Hillary Clinton’s campaign, which is not only not 1,500 delegates behind Barack Obama but might, by some reckoning, catch up with him in the popular vote total — and in any event remains excruciatingly close to Obama in all measures — is different.  Obama’s supporters, in the campaign, in the Democratic party, and in the press are desperate for her to leave the race precisely because her support is so substantial; her continued presence is a daily reminder of how profoundly divided the party is at this moment….

[In her victory speech] Clinton repeated her insistence that delegates from Florida and Michigan — “all of their delegates” — be seated.  “I believe we should honor the votes cast by 2.3 million people in those states,” she said.  Her demand was pooh-poohed in some circles of the commentariat, but the question for Democrats is, Why is that such a radioactive proposition?  This is the party that got rather excited over 537 votes in Florida in 2000, the party that would like to pass something called the Count Every Vote Act, the party that has consistently favored greater enfranchisement over stricter enforcement of the rules (and sometimes the law).  Sure, Clinton wants to change the agreement that existed going in to Florida and Michigan, but circumstances have changed, too.  Since when have Democrats been such sticklers for unbending rules?  Why do so many in the party insist that millions of votes in two key states be counted only if they don’t matter — that is, if the result is a fait accompli — and not be counted if they do?

Byron York — Byron York is is the author of The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Grassley’s Kangaroo Court

So now it looks like next Thursday. On Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s manifestly meritorious nomination to the Supreme Court, what was supposed to be the vote out of the Senate Judiciary Committee this past Thursday now appears to be sliding into a hearing to be held next Thursday. Or, who knows, maybe a Thursday ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Censure Dianne Feinstein

Regardless of the fate of Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination, the Senate should censure the ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein. Her deception and maneuvering, condemned across the political spectrum, seriously interfered with the Senate’s performance of its constitutional duty to ... Read More

Are We on the Verge of Civil War?

Americans keep dividing into two hostile camps. It seems the country is back to 1860 on the eve of the Civil War, rather than in 2018, during the greatest age of affluence, leisure, and freedom in the history of civilization. The ancient historian Thucydides called the civil discord that tore apart the ... Read More