The Corner

Historic Doesn’t Always Mean Good

One last point about Meet the Press. This morning, David Gregory said:

Speaking about balance, Mike Murphy, there’s a lot of Republicans who, who seek a little balance in all of this discussion of history. There’s a, a congressman who wrote on his Web site, “Just because it’s historic doesn’t mean it’s good.”

Maybe I just couldn’t read Gregory’s tone. But does anybody in the world disagree with that point? The arguments over health-care reform aside, does anybody disagree? Just because something is an historic accomplishment, never mind an historic expansion of government, that in of itself doesn’t make it good, right?

Recommended

The Latest