The Corner

How Conservatives Should Think About Immigration Reform

What should conservatives think of immigration reform? Conservatives believe in personal economic freedom and open trade in fair markets, and they favor pro-growth policies. They recognize that price and wage competition benefits the public, and that monopolies, shortages, gluts, and similar woes are either figments of a liberal imagination or the direct result of an overly intrusive government. And conservatives are grounded in economic reality and inured to the temptations of both liberal fantasies for government reinvention of the human condition and ideological assertions not based on the facts.

As a result, conservatives believe that “wherever it may lead, a debate on U.S. immigration policy ought to be based on facts. Regrettably, a number of myths about immigration work against a reasoned debate. The sum of these myths is that immigrants lower the standard of living of U.S. natives. This simply is not supported by the evidence.”

Of course it isn’t. After all, conservatives understand the flexibility and growth capacity of markets: “If immigrants were to cause large amounts of unemployment in particular industries, the phenomenon would surely be noticeable. Yet no empirical study has found such unemployment in noticeable amounts.” Instead, “Immigrants not only create new jobs indirectly with their spending, they create new jobs with new businesses, which they are more likely than natives to start.”

Finally, when it comes to the welfare state — certainly not a favorite of conservatives — we understand that “it is frequently alleged that immigrants no sooner arrive in the U.S. than they become public charges, draining welfare money from the U.S. taxpayers and paying no taxes. Solid evidence gives the lie to this charge.”

Those sentiments, expressed in a 1984 study on immigration reform by the Heritage Foundation, remain the beacon of conservative thought. A subsequent 2006 study on immigration reform by Heritage had nearly identical findings and sentiments. These studies directed conservatives to evaluate the merits of immigration and other policy reforms by their impact on the growth, vibrancy, and health of the private sector.

Imagine the confusion among thoughtful conservatives, then, when in 2007, and repackaged and rereleased today as version 2.0, a Heritage study failed to consider the implications of reform and instead looked solely at the cost of low-skilled immigrants and those effects on the government’s profitability! Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. 

What is the impact on innovation and entrepreneurship? Are there new avenues for upward mobility through small businesses and job creation? Will the America of the next generation be an advanced hub of global commerce, or next in line behind a fading Europe and declining Japan?

Those are important questions.

What clearly does not matter is the Left’s favorite metric for policy success: the profit or loss accruing to the government. After all, the task of taming the exploding welfare state and turning our system of taxation from class warfare to common good is a battle for another day and place.

Without change, the broken Social Security system will make future beneficiaries the victims of a 25 percent slash in benefits during their retirement. Medicare runs a $300 billion cash-flow deficit today and will collapse under its red ink without real reform. Medicaid provides poor Americans with poorer care and impoverishes states in the process.

Conservatives understand that the progressive Left will deploy the politics of fear and envy to argue that red ink dictates the need for no reform other than higher taxes. Conservatives have learned this should be ignored, and that real fiscal solutions require fundamental reforms that will be much easier to accomplish in a vibrant, growing economy. 

Immigration reform is a step toward that future. It is not, however, puppies, kittens, and sunshine. It is full of hard calls on security, employer rights and obligations, appropriate penalties, legal lines that must be drawn, sectoral economic policies, and fundamental visa reforms. The necessary upshot is that reform legislation will be long and complicated, and will satisfy no one entirely. That is the nature of the legislative beast.

That reality should not disguise the core opportunity afforded by immigration reform: a stronger economy, more rapid economic growth, greater economic opportunity, and a commitment to the premise that free people in pursuit of their dreams benefit all of society. 

For years, the progressive Left has been peddling the notion that this very commitment is a hoax designed to perpetuate a classist society of exploitation. It would be a shame to see the opportunity for a conservative policy victory fall victim to this sinister vision.

Most Popular

PC Culture

Hate-Crime Hoaxes Reflect America’s Sickness

On January 29, tabloid news site TMZ broke the shocking story that Jussie Smollett, a gay black entertainer and progressive activist, had been viciously attacked in Chicago. Two racist white men had fractured his rib, poured bleach on him, and tied a noose around his neck. As they were leaving, they shouted ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Strange Paradoxes of Our Age

Modern prophets often say one thing and do another. Worse, they often advocate in the abstract as a way of justifying their doing the opposite in the concrete. The result is that contemporary culture abounds with the inexplicable — mostly because modern progressivism makes all sorts of race, class, and ... Read More
PC Culture

Fake Newspeople

This week, the story of the Jussie Smollett hoax gripped the national media. The story, for those who missed it, went something like this: The Empire actor, who is both black and gay, stated that on a freezing January night in Chicago, in the middle of the polar vortex, he went to a local Subway store to buy a ... Read More
World

Ilhan Omar’s Big Lie

In a viral exchange at a congressional hearing last week, the new congresswoman from Minnesota, Ilhan Omar, who is quickly establishing herself as the most reprehensible member of the House Democratic freshman class despite stiff competition, launched into Elliott Abrams. She accused the former Reagan official ... Read More
U.S.

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More
Elections

One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders, the antique Brooklyn socialist who represents Vermont in the Senate, is not quite ready to retire to his lakeside dacha and so once again is running for the presidential nomination of a party to which he does not belong with an agenda about which he cannot be quite entirely ... Read More
PC Culture

Merciless Sympathy

Jussie Smollett’s phony hate-crime story could have been taken apart in 24 hours, except for one thing: Nobody wanted to be the first to call bullsh**. Who will bell the cat? Not the police, and I don’t blame them. Smollett is a vocal critic of President Donald Trump who checks two protected-category ... Read More