The Corner

How Obamacare Divides Our Nation: A Chart

The chart below, from JP Morgan’s Michael Cembalest, is making the rounds (a more complete explanation is here), and if there’s one chart that better explains the continued divisiveness of Obamacare in American life, I’ve yet to see it. Simply put, Obamacare was the most partisan piece of social legislation passed in the last 100 years.

Of course, as with all claims of divisiveness, it takes both sides to divide (after all, one side can always surrender), but we have reached a point where every single Republican is required by their constituents to demonstrate opposition to Obamacare, while the vast majority of Democrats are required by their constituents to demonstrate support. Given the importance of health care to each American, I can think of few better formulas for continued national division.

The Democrats are fond of pointing to presidential election results and saying — in a manner reminiscent of playground trash talk — “scoreboard.” They won the presidency. Conservatives lost. Move on. Yet as Jim Geraghty and others have noted, each Republican member of Congress has their own “scoreboard” to point to as well – their own election.  

At its worst, this rhetoric is antithetical to a constitutional republic. Ramming through partisan national legislation that not only transforms the health-care system but also profoundly impacts the American economy and the fundamental constitutional rights of every American and then proclaiming, “We won” is more reminiscent of pure majoritarianism than the constitutional tradition of enumerated powers and checks and balances. Majoritarianism may be democracy, but it is not American democracy.

If that’s how the game is to be played, expect more partisan legislation, more scoreboard-pointing, and more legislative brinksmanship. As constitutional liberties and governmental restraint diminish, the stakes of each election rise immensely, and the soaring rhetoric of 2008 is replaced by absurd references to terrorists and suicide vests — with devastating consequences to our political culture.

Hope and change, indeed.

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular



For your amusement, I hope, I’ve done a Jaywalking episode. It begins with a bit of the overture to Semiramide -- a Rossini opera I reviewed from the Met last week. Then I get into Russia and, after a while, China. The Marriott company fired an employee for “liking” a tweet by a Tibetan independence group. ... Read More

Campaigns for World Down Syndrome Day Go Viral

As World Down Syndrome Day approaches on Wednesday, several campaigns supporting those with the condition have taken over the Internet. Fifty mothers of children with the condition put together a viral video of them and their children singing along in the car. The video helped the children and their mothers ... Read More

Viva l’Italia?

Italy has just had elections, with very interesting results. I wanted to talk with Alberto Mingardi, which I have. He is one of the leading classical liberals in Italy -- the director general of the Bruno Leoni Institute, in Milan. (Mingardi himself is Milanese.) He is also an authority in arts and letters. In ... Read More

Putin and the Cult of Leadership

On Sunday, Russian dictator Vladimir Putin won an unsurprising reelection-campaign victory against Communist Party candidate Pavel Grudinin, by a margin of 76.7 percent to 11.8 percent. The results were unsurprising because Putin is a tyrant who murders or imprisons political rivals, and who isn’t afraid to use ... Read More

Trump and Brexit Derangement Syndrome

I am not one of those Brexiteers who believe that Brexit and Trumpism are essentially the same phenomenon in two different countries. To be sure, they both draw on some of the same political trends, notably a distrust of elites and an upsurge of popular anger over evident failures of public policy such as illegal ... Read More