The Corner

How Tuition Tax Credits Fuel the Higher-Ed Industrial Complex

Over the past several days, President Obama has released a serious of ambitious domestic policy proposals that he will more formally unveil in tonight’s State of the Union address. Most of these proposals, thankfully, will be blocked by Republicans in Congress. Their real purpose is to put a marker down – to let voters know where the president and his allies stand on higher taxes on the rich (they’re for it), tuition-free community college (they’re for that too), and dastardly cyberattacks (they’re against them). To my surprise, at least one of his proposals has some merit. 

Specifically, the president is calling for paring back the benefits associated with 529 college-savings plans. Right now, these plans are quite generous, as Annamaria Andriotis of the Wall Street Journal has explained: parents contribute to 529 plans with after-tax income, and earnings that accumulate over time in the plans can be drawn tax-free, provided they are used to meet various approved college costs. Under the president’s proposal, all new contributions will be treated differently. Taxes on earnings will be deferred until earnings are withdrawn, at which point they’ll be treated like ordinary income. Suddenly, 529 plans will become far less attractive. 

Why do I think this proposal has merit? Many of the analysts I trust most, like Ryan Ellis of Americans for Tax Reform, hate it, and see it as an unjustifiable middle-class tax hike. And like Ellis, I strongly favor reducing taxes on savings and investment. In my ideal world, we’d move towards something like a progressive consumption tax. So don’t get me wrong: I’m all for helping families, including well-off families, save and build wealth. The reason I’m sympathetic to paring back the benefits associated with 529 plans is that tuition tax breaks appear to be an extremely ineffective way of making higher education more affordable — indeed, one scholar I trust, Andrew Gillen of Education Sector, has actually suggested that they might contribute to tuition increases.

How, you ask? All kinds of financial aid, from direct grants to low-income students to tuition tax credits that benefit all students, including high-income students, increase demand for higher education. It is important, however, that while direct grants to low-income students only increase demand for low-income students, who are less likely to go to college than more affluent students in the first place, tuition tax credits increase demand for all students, including those who are already willing and able to spend large sums on higher education. Colleges can respond to increased demand by increasing supply (e.g., admitting more students), by becoming more selective, or by charging higher prices to capture more of the aid. Different colleges will respond to increased demand in different ways. For example, for-profit schools are particularly inclined to increase supply (mo’ students, mo’ money) while non-profit schools that hope to climb the prestige ladder are more likely to at least try to become more selective (let’s goose our U.S. News ranking!). What do you think colleges are likely to do if middle- and upper-middle- and simply upper-income households have large sums sloshing around in their 529 plans? Will they gingerly try to extract as little from these families as possible, knowing that they saved conscientiously over the years to give junior a decent education? Or will they hike tuition to extract as much as they can? And given that withdrawals from 529 plans are only tax-free if they’re used for qualified higher education expenses, guess what: we will see ever more gold-plated dormitories and other luxurious amenities on college campuses to better soak up this money.  

Reliable evidence on the efficacy of tuition tax credits is scarce. I’d recommend taking a look at new findings from economists George B. Bulman and Caroline Hoxby. Bulman and Hoxby don’t find compelling evidence for Gillen’s twist on the Bennett Hypothesis, which I describe above. (I still think colleges wind up extracting the money, but I certainly don’t have rock-solid proof.) Yet they conclude that tuition tax credits have negligible effects on college attendance. Nor does it appear that students are “upgrading,” or attending “better” schools than they might have in the absence of the tax credits. So overall, we don’t appear to be getting much bang for the buck. Actually, we don’t appear to be getting any bang for the buck. 

By all means, let’s look out for the interests of savers. But let’s not just look out for the interests of savers who fork over their savings to higher education institutions that are quite happy to rob them blind. They key to making higher education better and more accessible is not to help families pay exorbitant tuition — it’s to make the sector more competitive and cost-effective.

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

PC Culture

My Empathy, Their Wickedness

Lately many of the people who make their living writing about politics have come to rely on just two exclusive courses of treatment for their subjects. Voters for Brexit and Donald Trump were extensively subjected to these treatments. Now, so are Palestinians in Gaza and “involuntarily celibate” men who post ... Read More

Americans Are Royally Confused about Monarchy

Conventional wisdom regarding America’s relationship with royalty goes something like this: Americans have no time for monarchy as a political concept but can’t get enough of the British royal family. The American media’s round-the-clock coverage of the recent royal wedding certainly seems ample evidence of ... Read More

The Trump Rationale

Why exactly did nearly half the country vote for Donald Trump? Why also did the arguments of Never Trump Republicans and conservatives have marginal effect on voters? Despite vehement denunciations of the Trump candidacy from many pundits on the right and in the media, Trump nonetheless got about the same ... Read More

Responsibility and Blame

David L. Bahnsen has written a book on themes dear to my heart. It’s called “Crisis of Responsibility: Our Cultural Addiction to Blame and How You Can Cure It.” I have done a Q&A with the author, here. Thinking about his book, I remembered a few things — and shared them with David in our podcast. ... Read More
White House

A Thought on the Trump-DOJ Scandal

We Americans have a habit of putting fundamental social and political questions out of our minds by turning them into technical legal questions. This tendency is one of the forces at work in the increasingly dramatic showdown between the Department of Justice and the President of the United States. There is ... Read More

Richard Pipes, Historian of Totalitarianism

‘My subject is the Russian Revolution, arguably the most important event of the twentieth century. It is my considered judgment that, had it not been for the Russian Revolution, there would very likely have been no National Socialism; probably no Second World War and no decolonization; and certainly no Cold ... Read More

School Shootings and the Incentives of Violence

Today’s Morning Jolt discusses school shootings and the common difficulties of the teenage years, and I thought of another aspect that I forgot to include -- the degree to which our society, in its reaction to violence, inadvertently rewards that violence. Every teenager wants attention, to be recognized, to ... Read More

The Christian America Paradox

You could call it the Christian America paradox: few things have contributed more to the nation’s culture and identity than the broadly shared Christian faith and worldview of its people, yet the very nature of a society that combines religious pluralism (as a matter of both legal right and social norm) with a ... Read More

Four No Trump

I went to see Book Club, a multi-pronged romantic comedy that provides a vehicle for four veteran actresses (Jane Fonda, Diane Keaton, Candice Bergen, and Mary Steenburgen), and it's not bad if you accept it for what it is. The set-up is that four women who formed a book club in the 1970s have been meeting ... Read More
White House

Trump the Outsider

Yesterday morning, President Donald Trump offered a series of tweets complaining about what he considers the disparate treatment of his presidential campaign compared with Hillary ... Read More