The Corner

Science & Tech

Hybrid Sheep-Human Embryos Show Need for Biotech Regulation

The world’s first clone of an adult animal, Dolly at the Roslin Institute in Edinburgh, Scotland January 4, 2002. (Jeff J Mitchell/Reuters)

Biotech is rocketing forward into areas that impact life at the most fundamental and basic levels.

CRISPR permits any cell or life form to be genetically altered, opening the door to the intelligent (or stupid) redesign of the human species, the ending of terrible diseases, or the unleashing by terrorists of an altered viral pandemic.

Scientists have created synthetic life not based in evolution or Creation.

Human cloning is being done. A recent monkey success reveals the potential of the birth of the first cloned baby.

And now, scientists have created a embryo that is 0.01 percent human. From the National Geographic story:

Building on a controversial breakthrough made in 2017, scientists announced on Saturday that they have created the second successful human-animal hybrids: sheep embryos that are are 0.01-percent human by cell count.

The embryos, which were not allowed to develop past 28 days of age, move researchers a small step closer to perhaps growing human organs for medical transplant.

That would be terrific. Of course, animal-rights activists will howl at using animals as sources of human organs, but then, that is because they are essentially anti-human.

But there is a very real concern here that scientists could manufacture an animal that has a partial human nature, say the capacity for rationality. That would be an ethical nightmare on several fronts.

The point I keep trying to make isn’t that we should shut down all of this research, but that we need to have an intense discussion about how to best ensure it doesn’t wander into unethical fields.

Hell, we need to decide what would be unethical.

But Trump doesn’t even Tweet on the issue, and beyond some voluntary guidelines and public funding restrictions, there is little to prevent a real life Dr. Moreau from holding forth — particularly in China.

We really do need to have an intense democratic discussion about biotechnology, AI, and other such fast-advancing research. Time is growing short.

Wesley J. Smith — Wesley J. Smith is a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism.

Most Popular


Rebels without a Cause

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including anyone else who needs to disclose that they’re Michael Cohen’s client), When I lived in Prague as a younger man -- by ... Read More

The Scholarship/Activism Balance — A Rejoinder

The Martin Center recently published an article by sociology professor Fabio Rojas, in which he argued that professors should maintain the right balance between their teaching and scholarship on the one hand, and activism on the other. In today's article, the Center's Jay Schalin pushes back somewhat. Schalin ... Read More

The Book Comey Wanted to Write

Making the click-through worthwhile: the book James Comey had wanted to write, Facebook starts to feel useless to some writers, an infamous D.C. city councilman manages to make everything worse, and Hillary Clinton’s campaign finds its wish granted. What Did James Comey’s First Draft of A Higher ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Good News for Pompeo

Looks like he's in, as he should be. But this fight has been a hint of what life will be like for Trump if the Democrats somehow take the Senate -- they'd refuse to confirm anyone for anything. Read More

What Self-Help Guru Tony Robbins Was Trying to Say

Tony Robbins must have known immediately that he'd made a huge mistake in how he responded to a question about #MeToo. Last month, at one of Robbins's popular, sold-out seminars, audience member Nanine McCool told the self-help guru that she thought he misunderstood the #MeToo movement. You can see the entire ... Read More