The Corner

Politics & Policy

On Citizenship for Illegal Aliens

In response to Poetry

I disagree with one point of Mark Krikorian’s analysis below: I don’t think citizenship should be handed out willy-nilly, even if we are to have something like an amnesty.

There are all sorts of reasons to immigrate to a new country, legally or illegally, permanently or temporarily. We often hear that the illegals from Mexico and elsewhere simply want to work and to earn a living. Where that’s the case, fine. Working and earning a living are honorable pursuits. But citizenship is about something else. It isn’t about finding a better job or a better house, or even about escaping terrible conditions back home. Citizenship isn’t about what’s been left behind, but about what is here.

The last time we offered an amnesty and a “path to citizenship,” most of the illegals did not seek or secure citizenship. Why? The Washington Post has a very plausible explanation: They didn’t come here looking for citizenship. They came here looking to earn a living.

The United States isn’t an ethno-state of the traditional kind, and it isn’t bound together by any particular religious creed or, given the example in the White House, even by a common language. Most Americans do not have roots going back to the Revolution, and a great many do not have roots going back even so far as the Civil War. (Or Vietnam, for that matter.) What we have is citizenship, the rights and duties of free men and women in a self-governing republic operating under a government of laws, not a government of men. Following the law matters.

So does wanting citizenship — which is not the same as merely wanting the benefits associated with citizenship. If we are going to have an amnesty (and I am not at all convinced we should) then we should limit it to giving out permanent residency, with citizenship possible — possible — on a case-by-case basis.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More