The Corner

Economy & Business

No Natives Need Apply

In a case that went unnoticed by the national press, a major Houston-area food supplier was fined back in April for systematically favoring (mainly immigrant) Hispanic job applicants over (mainly native-born) non-Hispanic applicants. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission accused Lawler Foods of telling black and white applicants there were no openings, discouraging them with horror stories about the nature of the work, and unnecessarily requiring Spanish-language skills. One hiring manager acknowledged “subconscious” bias against non-Hispanic applicants. Perhaps most tellingly, Lawler’s low-skill workforce is less than 1 percent black in an area where blacks are around 30 percent of the population.

There is little doubt that immigrants have been replacing native-born workers in unskilled jobs. Among working-age native men without a high-school degree, 40 percent are not even looking for work. The comparable figure for low-skill immigrant men is just 12 percent. Why such a disparity? Some argue that the loss of good-paying manufacturing jobs and direct competition with immigrants has chased low-skill natives from the labor force. Others blame the welfare state and the weakening of social sanctions against idleness. Under the latter theory, low-skill natives do not feel pressure to work regularly, and they do not exert full effort even when they are on the job. That belief is likely Lawler’s real motivation for discouraging non-Hispanics from even applying.

Regardless of the causes, however, it is clear that immigration is serving as a band-aid over the problems experienced by low-skill natives. No one has to take their interests seriously as long as a steady flow of new immigrant workers ensures that businesses keep operating as usual. As I wrote in a piece for The American Conservative last week, “Instead of searching for ways to get native men back to work . . . politicians and businessmen have brought in immigrants to do the work instead. Imagine how their focus would change if there were no supply of new immigrants to harvest their vegetables, weed their gardens, or hang their drywall.” They would likely take a much greater interest in improving the prospects of low-skill natives.

Jason Richwine is a public-policy analyst and a contributor to National Review Online.

Most Popular


‘Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself’

It was just one more segment to fill out the hour, and thereby fill the long 24 hours of Saturday’s cable news on November 2. Or so it seemed. Navy SEAL Mike Ritland was on the Fox News program Watters World to talk to Jesse Watters about trained German shepherds like the one used in the raid that found ... Read More
White House

Impeachment Theater of Trolls

As a boy, I used to watch a television show with a weekly gag titled “MasterJoke Theatre.” A pompous egghead smoked a pipe in a leather-bound chair in a richly appointed library, told a joke, and got a pie in the face for his trouble. What the Democrats launched on the Hill this week is their own variant, ... Read More

A Defining Statement of Modern Conservatism

The greatest documents in American history never lose their ability to astonish. They deserve, and repay, careful study, and inevitably have contemporary resonances no matter how long ago they were written or uttered. There’s no doubt that Ronald Reagan’s “A Time for Choosing” belongs in the top ranks ... Read More
White House

The Russian Conspiracy That Won’t Die

The Mueller report accomplished nothing. Whether you thought that the two-year, $32 million investigation was warranted or not, the report promised to establish a factual record that both sides could accept, especially on the explosive charge that Donald Trump had conspired with the Russians to win the ... Read More